this is the definition of being delusional
the switch is still a thing?
awesome features, really cool, but as a videogame it's a borefest.
that's what you get when you're ignoring all market standards and keep acting too arrognat to take some advice. it's a wonder not every n-update is an utter mess.
another indie vr title. sigh. big fan of vr but i'm sick and tired of these proof of concepts. it is about time a proper studio produced a proper vr experience. no one wants to take the risk because a failure could mean the end of a smaller studio. frankly, though, this is not my problem as a customer. produce somethjng worth the while, do a proper market research and for the sake of it, let vr mature already. stupid indie pseudo vr game producers.
well, if soneone played the first one, one does not need a calulator to see that the basic premise of this franchise is as bad as in the first one. this basic premise is all the reason i need to stay away from every new instalment. because there are no miracles in this world, you know. this review is pretty accurate. maybe one point too high even.
if only more people showed such a view. this is the only view that forces them to give us what we want. but as long as everybody and their mother are supporting such games blindly - nothing will ever change. it will even get worse. vote with your freaking wallets already. and stop whining.
ah the game no one wants to play because someone thought hopping on a trend is enough to make people care.
it did. but mcdonalds is also serving millions a day and it is utter crap
okay. had to scroll 4 posts down until i got the title. this very bad teaser text prevented me from clicking. i mean, blogger or bloggeresse: if you had to make the title such a secret because you feared no one would click your article, then rightly so.
but arent all these mee-too multiplayer shooters dying very quickly after release? it feels like i have to read every week about the next butthurt dev who argues how stupid gamers are to not care for his 25th variation of the same. multiplayer shooters were fun when i was younger. but at some point you realize you meet always the same 3 or 4 boring types of humans in online games. the cheater, the punk, the righteous and the self righteous. at least a proper ai can be programmed to surprise m...
so it will be the usual week of single player for more common gamers. but still, not buying multiplayer centered titles. no fun.
they are changing demographics, not gaming
indie galore. who the eff cares?
no doubt i had fun in the 90s with ff7. can't say that i want to play an enhanced version. i doubt they are capable of implementing the charm of these sprites with their emotions. today's titles are completely soulless. i'm not sure i want to play a soulless ff7 reimagining :/
it is beyond me why peiple are still supporting this gt franchise when the ps3 version was already a joke? is everybody expecting a miracle or why is this? or are they just and simply slaves to the brand? good for the devs,i say.
no one needs indies on a highend console. these games are better off on the switch thingie, imo.
blogger, this is a proper rpg with open world-ish exploration and very high production values that meet every standard of the tv show. your 3.5 comes over as a bit out of touch here.
i smell the sense of paid news
i‘m going to the states end of the week. this would be the perfect opportunity to get a switch thingey - if there was at least one proper incentive to get one. none of the real gems this generation is available on the thing (ark, xcom2). nintendos own games i stopped playing years ago because the formula is way too tired for my personal taste. and buying a console just for another overhyped mario game - i don‘t think so. so, i guess i‘ll play my macbook in the hotelroom. but i also guess, the...