CGI-Quality

Contributor
CRank: 5Score: 46150

Errr...when have they NOT shown what they "told"?

4468d ago 5 agree3 disagreeView comment

No need to reiterate, but then, your bubbles will see to it that you WON'T be able to do so, in here, again.

4468d ago 5 agree2 disagreeView comment

Cool, then you have no need to remain in this topic. Use the second piece of your name and "blaze" on outta here. ;)

OT: The PS3 already prepared me for that! Can't wait!

4468d ago 36 agree1 disagreeView comment

Did you read the article? He states several times in it that it's nothing confirmed, yet.

4469d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

MGS4 was 33GB. Besides, games are getting bigger. Minimum requirements can't stay low forever.

OT: I'm good to go!

4469d ago 1 agree3 disagreeView comment

Good, don't buy it then. Some other gamer out there will gladly take it off your hands, anyway.

4469d ago 29 agree2 disagreeView comment

They didn't forget, they just don't want to face it. Nothing new, typical of partisans Hell-bent on downplaying what they don't favor.

OT: Of course. Never had any doubt!

4469d ago 31 agree2 disagreeView comment

Considering your history, it's pointless for you to offer your "opinion" here. And your kids comment is just complete BS.

4469d ago 5 agree1 disagreeView comment

Even if you agree with his point of view, I give the previewer more credit than an internet goer with zero hands-on time.

4469d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

I'm guessing you don't understand the specs of these devices. Let's begin with that CPU difference - any source?

4469d ago 16 agree10 disagreeView comment

He's not doing anything any different from what you do in Sony articles. Quit being the pot, the kettle is tired of hearing it.

OT: The possibility of the vid being the problem is likely, but we won't know until reviews start trickling in within the next few weeks!

4469d ago 26 agree7 disagreeView comment

I knew this topic would be derailed with an entire wealth of games not pertaining to this.

OT: All three look incredible. Can't call a definitive winner there, and it's just because how great they all look!

4470d ago 3 agree1 disagreeView comment

@ Wander: Yeah, let me know when that's even close to happening and your silly comment might hold a little bit of something.

4470d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

There is no reduction of quality at all.

And who said it was a downgrade for you to agree with? You're the only one in here saying any such foolishness.

4471d ago 21 agree3 disagreeView comment

Killzone 3 wasn't bad at all, nope not even when comparing it with 2 (which I agree, was better).

OT: The improvements are QUITE apparent!

4471d ago 15 agree3 disagreeView comment

Samsung has nothing to do with this VIDEO GAME situation. Thus, pointless post is pointless.

4471d ago 33 agree3 disagreeView comment

@ TIER: Then where are the benchmarks that back up the specs? If the 290x is truly better than the Titan, you could bet your bottom dollar that AMD would be shouting it from every rooftop they could find.

4471d ago 5 agree0 disagreeView comment

Care to explain how it is better than either the Titan or 780 Ti?

4471d ago 7 agree2 disagreeView comment

I mean, how much should a first person shooter change? Better graphics, more expansive environments, more ons-creen/ All will have this.

4471d ago 13 agree1 disagreeView comment

How sad is it that we have people that think (and act) like you.

4472d ago 22 agree0 disagreeView comment