John, the author, has a cult following of PC gamers on his site. He doesn't rely on Google traffic or average readers, and he spams UE5 articles every single day.
The entire game isn't available to play. This is just some missions, a tutorial, and a horde mode. There's no campaign.
Death Stranding sold 4.1M as of Feb 2022 per Insomniac leaks.
Anything but real metrics. They're learning from Microsoft.
Read the title again but slowly this time.
Yeah, let's praise 343i for releasing their most mediocre campaign yet and a good multiplayer they failed to support.
His argument is that Ubisoft, which is known for its not so great PC ports, has just released an excellent port for Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora at the same time as other platforms. If Ubisoft can do it why not the best in the industry?
However, he seems to miss that Avatar and Dead Island 2 are nowhere close to GTA technically or mechanically.
2023 is making piracy great again. Publishers' greed to double/triple regional prices in struggling economies, record number of broken ports, and $70/€80/$110 price tags are all contributing.
Let's see:
Light No Fire had the highest views of TGA with 4.65M across HelloGames, TGA, IGN, and GameSpot YouTube Channels.
In second place came God of War Ragnarok's DLC, Valhalla, with 4.25M.
In third place came Marvel's Blade with 3.9M (3.4M of which came from Marvel Entertainment YouTube channel).
No other game reached a million (neither Hellblade II nor Kojima's OD). It's clear where players&...
Someone didn't have a PS1.
Talk about delusional. The only valid response was Corey Strobbe's. It makes sense why the game has a campaign at all given the circumstances around its development, however, that doesn't shield it from criticism. No one can take a slight jab nowadays.
The heads of the studio already spent the $1.2B buying shares back from their employees.
The Master Race being treated like second-class as always.
They know GTA V online audience well. Coomers will be very happy.
Sarcasm.
If they enjoy the game, yes, people will shill out money. But Diablo IV isn't gaining any fanfare.
It took a nosedive during the ABK debacle, but this is a powerful thrust.
So which one is it: 720p upscaled or a $2,000 GPU?
A $700 GPU beats a $500 console in an Nvidia sponsored title where the equivalent of the PS5's AMD GPU performs the same as 3060. In other words, if you get 71 FPS with 3080, you get 32 FPS with 3060/PS5.
How would another year change the terrible design choices they've made?