Err...what? I'm not going to try understand.
Balance is key. Right now Sony needs to show more AAA games to even out the seemingly indie focus they currently have going on.
That TitanRise.
Battlefield Bad Company 2 safe...that's all that matters to me.
But Xbox One had more exclusives at retail at the time, still does, so your logic is thwarted.
How so?
Classes huh? So it's not just Supercars then. Cool, I was told it would not have classes.
You are on a rampage accusing people of all sorts of things aren't you? Funny thing is that your accusations are baseless, you attack every Xbox fan that likes this game and claim they didn't like Resistance or Insomniac or Infamous or whatever fits your current agenda.
Lol who cried about Deep Down? Don't nobody want that F2P stuff.
Is that a tear I see? *licks* So salty and bitter and yet so so sweet! More please!
Bungie. Halo. Xbox. PS fans. Hate
Bungie. Destiny. Multiplat. Sony partnership. PS fans. Ermergerd it's so awesome!
Yes, a Lombax and a self aware robot with equally as zany weapons were far more believable and 30 something year oldish... -___-
Wish people would just say I" don't like this game because it is on Xbox One only" and get it over and done with so that the rest of us don't have to weed through the nonsense they write instead.
@DragonKnight
The reason IG went multiplat in the first place was the desire to own their IPs. Their situation at the time (2nd party to Sony) was not condusive to that desire...
You need only look at the last 10 years and see if you can recall any game whatsoever created by a 2nd party dev and published by Sony that Sony didn't take ownership of.
Sony greenlight alot of games, bless them, but best you know that any game they publish WILL become t...
***This assumes that Sony wouldn't have done this in the first place. It also assumes that other publishers wouldn't have done the same and allowed them to go completely third-party.***
Your comment implies that you believe different, that Sony would have allowed them to keep the IP when they have clearly shown to do the contrary for the past 10 years.
Also, Microsoft have been allowing 2nd party developers to retain ownership of games they publish si...
Oh for the love of Mary!! As if this game didn't have enough hate from "those we do not speak of" now you just had to throw a rock at the hornets' nest!
Let's just let games be please!
Name one ps exclusive game in recent history from a second party developer that Sony has allowed to retain ownership of the IP. Every single game that they publish, they keep.
MS on the other hand allows many second party devs to keep their IP's despite publishing it so it is no surprise that Insomniac chose MS after years of working on IPs for Sony only to walk away with no ownership.
Can you honestly sit there and judge them for going with MS when they have a hi...
@Newmonday, nice try but in none of those did I say it was boring or that I didn't like it.
1. I was not impressed by the SALES...does that mean I don't like it? No.
2. I concluded from THAT particular review that the game was pretty but gameplay was lacking. Did that prove that I disliked "glides on wires, use cars as jump pads, got a electric amp"? Not even close.
3. There was an article asking if inFAMOUS was the best game in its genre. I was answe...
Show me ONE instance where I said ANYTHING about not liking inFAMOUS SS or thinking it was boring Dark Fist. Just ONE and Ill leave the site forever!
I liked inFAMOUS 1 and 2, I have no reason to think SS is boring since I have not played it.
Yes we are. You win, sony is the best. Now you can go and never come back.
Thing is, fanboys cry the most when reviewers use the 0 - 40 part of the scale.
"2/10 should only be reserved for unplayable games" sound familiar?
Reviews are opinions made public, if a person doesn't like a game then they should be able to say so.