If you look up an antonym for an objective review, you will find this one. This person is a worse troll than anyone here, which is saying a great deal.
Never played a starfox game before. Finishinv up a few other games first and then I'll pick this up. Looks fun
Defending it is at least productive and implies and open mind and either history playing the game or want to. What is your point in wasting time on this article. You simply cant stand someone to ennoy a game. Is that it?
The only reason to worry is if you are getting your hopes up too high. If you are expecting only zelda, enjoy that. Temper your expectations. Why are you expecting more.?
Never had played the original and really enjoyed it on wii u. Im glad nintendo saved it and I'm glad it finally reached this milestone.
People will blame Nintendo for this, when they were the only company to offer it at launch this gen. I'm not seeing a way to avoid this if there is no disk drive. It didn't seem to hurt PS4, but BC is the one feature that might just kill the NX before it launches.
certainly would limit the need for a hard drive in the system.
Nintendo is a business, and ignoring a significant portion of potential customers is a mistake. Nintendo has not completely gone mobile, but they are embracing a signficant and rapidly growing population of potential customers. I think they have stated and have shown they intend to carefully toe a clear line they are using this to gain attention of these customers only, nothing more.
Ignoring these customers and not playing their game to some degree.
I just don't think starfox is as popular as people like to believe. Respectable early sales.
This way they avoid the annual drought that falls about that time.
Name one decent smartphone app that doesn't that make any real money. What's your point?
Neither. I wouldn't put it in either category. We feel everything must be polarizing and labeled, but it doesn't have to be.
Considering the Wii U on a hardware standpoint, on a scale somewhere between resounding success-10 and complete failure-0, I'd put it objectively about a 6, simply because of the barrier to entry for developers that seems apparent in their decision to not support it. Nintendo as a publisher, a 9. Major third party publishers, a 2
How about your own opinion? Simply quoting metacritic makes you look a total ass. No opinion from playing it? Kindly leave.
I would prefer eshop credits. I have most of these games.
Only thing to make this better would be for a graphics upgrade. Wayforward?
Very few of us here will be at e3. Do playable games matter?
If Nintendo is so irrelevant, why are there so many of these articles?
The system is designed to be played from disc, which will make your 32gb last as long, if not longer, than an equal amount of disc based games on other consoles with 500gb hard drives. It was about a year into the Wii U for me and only when I was switched to getting more digital media, and free games from the digital rewards program, that I needed an external, which was about $60 total for 1tb. (Toshiba convio connect w/ y adapter works perfectly)
The unfortunate side eff...
Do the other consoles make money? I don 't know. just asking. if they do not make money, then perhaps they are priced too low. This may give the perception that the Wii U is overpriced. That being said, a $249 price starting now with a couple of bundled games and a limited release $199 fire sale this holiday would likely entice more console sales, and sell more games, because you can play a lot of games in basically 11 months to easily justify the cost. Seems extreme, but it would ...
Bayonetta 2 has a 9.1/10 on metacritic, this is user, not critic, which coincidentally is a 91.
A million people purchased this game, presumably. 910,000 people liked the game. that 910,000 people at a minimum that might be interested in a sequel.
Whether they purchased at launch or at year 3, they still likely enjoyed the game, it does not matter how long it took to get there, numbers are still there.