*facepalm*
Stop wanting to be a Switch. Leave that for the casuals.
Another thing, how is this PS6 handheld going to work? Is it going to be like a Xbox Series S? Because we know how well that turned out, or is it going to be completely separate from the standard PS6 console?
Absolutely not. I purchase the majority of my games. I just don't support games which are overpriced for what you are getting or more importantly, no effort to ensure it is polished.
I would actually feel guilty if I pirated a game like Clair Obscur. Only reason I bring that up is you can see the effort and passion that was put into it. Funny enough, that was also using UE5 engine.
The reason this continues is because people keep supporting it by buying the game anyway.
I pirated the game myself, simply because the game should not be full price for a game that already exists, plus the game length, but regardless, do not support this.
Do not support companies that can't be bothered to polish their game. Either pirate it, or don't buy it on day one, and wait for a cheap sale.
If people stop supporting this practice, t...
It’s pathetic that people fall for these graphical gimmicks. Just goes to show how gullible and weak minded people are that are easily convinced by tricks and marketing.
Does the game look better with ray tracing? Yes. Does it make a difference? No.
How about focus on things that do make a difference, like improvement to AI and how they behave in games and more innovative gameplay mechanics.
Part of the reason why game development has b...
So instead of putting effort into improving performance by optimisation, they decide they can't be bothered to optimise and lower the shadow quality? lol
Not sure about this. Looks like its been downgraded from an action rpg to a generic fps to appease the casuals. We shall see.
Wouldn’t surprise me if it will be $80. If there is one game which can set the price to $80 and not have much, if any impact on sales, it’s GTA VI.
Both are totally different games.
Battlefield is more of a tactical shooter for veterens
COD is for casual gamers (pick up and play)
It's like comparing Mortal Kombat to Street Fighter, or should I say traditional Street Fighter.
So it's $50 US dollars for 13 hours of gameplay.
How much was Clair Obscur? How long was that game?
Still seems overpriced for only 13 hours. $40 max IMO.
It better be an amazing 13 hours
Interesting. KB/M is great for people who aren't good at aiming in videogames, though how is this going to factor into people who use controllers?
"I assume that DICE will lump console KB/M players together with PC players and utilize input-based matchmaking."
Never assume, though you would hope this is the case. Last thing you want is for people using controllers to be matched in the same match as scrubs who can't aim.
300p ?!?!?! LOL
Even using the magic of DLSS, 300p upscaled to 4K or even 1080p would be a blurry mess.
Secondly, seems like the Developers didn't even try to optimise the game.
I am starting to believe that Ubisoft really don't know why their games aren't good.
Do they seriously not notice that they use the exact same open world template for all their games?
This is partly the fault of the publishers who are overpricing their games.
I mean look at the new Donkey Kong. This game should be $60, at MOST. Nothing in the game screams $80.
Young people, if playing on PC, should learn how to use torrents.
So in other words, DLSS is not here to hide poor optimization?
Lack of DLSS does not explain performance drops. A lack of optimization explains performance drops.
There is nothing super impressive, graphically, with this game, to which even a Switch 2 can't handle.
It just so happens DLSS isn't in the game to HIDE poor optimization.
Take 'Sucker Punch' 'Sony' 'Ghost of' out of the title of the game and replace it with 'Ubisoft'
I guarantee you the same people defending Ghost of Yotei, would be brutalizing it, just like these same people did AC Shadows.
This describes The Witcher 3: Blood & Wine and that was an expansion.
TotK felt more of an expansion. (Same open world, new content and story) BoTW had a sense of exploration. TotK didn’t have that same level of exploration simply because you were exploring the same open world you already did in BotW. The puzzle shrines were also inferior due to too much focus on the new “glue objects together” mechanics.
Perhaps FBI resources should spend investigating and concentrating on things that are more important, not people "stealing" $$$ from a company which doesn't need anymore $$ anyway. Nintendo make enough profits.
Oh and btw, good luck taking down all the torrent sites that have the ROMS.
Don Mattrick created the 'beginning of the end'.
The 360 had a strong install base in the US market, then all of a sudden the next generation, a lot of them flocked to Playstation?
Why?
- Maybe the RROD was part of it and they were sick of it and were going to jump ship anyway?
- The Price of the Xbox One compared to the PS4
- The 'Always Online' aspect of the Xbox One
I believe all 3 of the above played...
I wonder if ex Ubisoft employees put “worked on Assassins Creed” on their resume or not, as it would give an automatic red flag to avoid hiring them.