Well, partly right, but it's this sort of censorship that leads to worse things. Everyone has a right to voice their opinion. If you stop people from voicing their concern, then you are nothing more than authoritarian in nature and that is not welcome either.
I can say that some people could be more eloquent with their responses, but I have seen venom from all sides.
I disagree with the WWII setting with fantasy roles and visuals, as EA did not mentio...
So you don't want Sony games to be exclusive, but you say they're overrated?
Something tells me you don't have first hand experience to rate them, and are a wee bit sore that your system of choice is lacking in 'overrated' exclusives.
Next gen, buy Playstation and you might not get so upset.
Yeah... Make a game in Dreams when it comes out Polygon, and we'll see how great your ideas are.
Polygon: Game reviews tackled without a grasp of gaming, escapism or fun.
Magna Cum Laude was a bit more than that.
That's easy to say when players are also counted on Game Pass.
What are the sales numbers?
Yeah, yeah. If you believe anything EA say at the minute, you're asking to be robbed.
This is the EA game that will bring in the 'pay to reload' idea.
Anyone else seen the limited ammo info? You'll be paying for larger magazines by 2020.
When helping people becomes abuse...
I hate modern society.
Another publisher that will be avoided.
Thanks.
Hmmm. Well, from what I see in the demo, the shadow creatures drag people off. Maybe if you die or KO somewhere in the world, a player can recover your body to stop the entities presence in that area?
I think it will be smarter than just run of the mill co-op.
Even saying that, the players that Microsoft lost are likely to be wary of jumping back, even if they do release a system earlier.
As long as Sony keep supplying great games until PS5 releases, and MS sit on their haunches, nothing will change.
I won't buy it... But here's why.
They have been talking about starting players off with limited ammo (for realism)... Is this the beginning of the 'pay for reloading' idea EA had a few years back?
I can honestly see them trying to implement bigger mags and bullet pack microtransactions when people get a little aggravated at having to conserve ammo in an action packed fps.
Be wary, they're steering you all into the ...
Great game. This and Alien 3 were two of the best licensed games of the SNES/Megadrive era.
So subscribe to your ISP, to subscribe to your console's online features, to buy an online game, just to subscribe to it's later content?
Fuck that. Too many people asking for monthly payments just to play a game. I'll stick to my dying single player games.
Also, cosmetic MT's are trash. They'll make you look so out of place in a WWII setting, that you have to pay if you want any realism... The thought that someone sat in a board room ...
What the hell are they doing with it? A woman with a cybernetic arm, period clothing wrong... Is this alternate universe stuff just for the sake of it?
Why say WWII, rather than just saying, this is not really WWII.
You missed Minecraft. They'll show true 4k Minecraft with new skins of your favourite corporate assholes...
This is what gaming is all about. Also, all the articles complaining about games and not having what they want... Now you can try and we can critique.
Like anyone hasn't been playing/watching the same stories over and over again since the film and gaming industries were born.
That's like saying you won't watch another Marvel movie because the good vs evil plot has been done before...
I'm not surprised. Making a WWII game that looks nothing like the time period, and then charging you to make it so.
That's pretty low. It should have been fantasy cosmetic microtransactions for people that don't care that millions of soldiers died for their freedoms and against an oppressive cult for them.