This doesnt look bad, but it is in no way what I would have expected from the franchise. The fighting looks very slow, although there are plenty of battle animations. The battletoads arcade actually looks better. That's too bad. This could have been a homerun. At best, it's a bunt.
I've seen enough of the game to intrigue me. They have actually showed quite a bit over the last couple years. Has been looking better and better each time. I understand, if you are looking for the next call of duty, you will be disappointed. If you are looking for a stealth, exploration, mystery, action game, this seems to be it. It actually looks like a sci fi metal gear solid to be honest.
Hey, great if it happens. Makes you wonder though, why would they make a game on a platform that would outsell their own hardware, unless they go software only? As much as people want gaming socialism, they are still in a buisness to make money. Why waste billions of r&d on their own hardware just to make a game for a rival platform? And the quote you pulled says "indicated". I'm sure gaming journalism wouldn't spin that at all. I mean, look at the title. It makes you th...
Cool, the switch gets ANOTHER vita port. Yeah, theres no ps4 version, and Sony probably wouldn't bother releasing it over here, but playing the vita version, I'd have to say they made the right decision. The game is crap.
Different opinions and such. The changes they made to the multiplayer made the game more accessible, I guess, but the first one was pure run and gun action, and felt more fluid. The campaign was a needed addition, but had a garbage basic ass story, but the final level was a great design. Best this gen though? Maybe compared to cod or battlefield.
The last notable release for me was mass effect 3. I bought mass effect andromeda for 10 dollars, but, other than that, bioware has been dead to me for years.
