DD works for music and handhelds atm because files are small. to use god of war for example, the game was 38 gigs. all of that might not have been game, some of it extras and whatnot, but if the DD didnt come with all that, i would still buy the disc. you might have time to DL 38 gigs just to play a rather short (but great) experience, but i dont
this ^^^^
not even half of everyone with a 360 has a gold live account, so im assuming that alot of people who bought conviction cant play denied ops
does have tiger. . . tiger woods, which kinect doesnt.
as in an almost exact carbon copy? not a bad thing, though, been enjoying the sh1t out of it!!
remember red dead revolver last gen? raise your hand if you bought it on ps2 (a million f@cking people raise their hands) now did you know that rdr on ps2 ran at about half the resolution of the xbox version, and half the framerate? but yet countless people enjoyed the piss out of it anyway. i cant believe there are people a few comments up saying mafia 2 is "unplayable" on ps3, and i'd like to know what demo you were playing, cuz ive beat it twice now, and it was perfectly p...
my 150 dollars has more "potential" than kinect
graphics aren't mindblowing, but why do they need to be? the demo was fun, i dont know what you guys are smokin
it has online co-op, 4 players i think. correct me if im wrong
to river city with trophies, so, im in!
it has nothing to do with the game, it just trendy now. i have friends that have only played cod this gen, and wont play anything else, and have missed out on so many awesome games, just so that they could go play the same thing everyday, on maps that they already played when call of duty 4 cameout. it kills me, its like they dont even like the new maps, and im like why didint you just keep playing cod4
maybe if we're lucky, they'll let us pay for maps from Mdub AND Mdub2 when it comes out.
YOU were hyped. people like me always knew it was gonna be shit
to get rid of the lag 100%. im not trying to flame Kinect, but its the nature of the camera. once you do the action in real life, kinect has to process it before sending the data to the game, then the game figures out what to do with the data. you'll never hit the same latency as a game pad. again, this is not a bad thing, just the way it is. unless kinect can predict what your movements will be, it'll never hit 1:1
because you actually have to aim yourself in killzone. most people these days are so reliant on snap targeting, they get owned in real games
hearkens back to older generations where it was the gameplay that mattered. would you give a 6/10 to super mario brothers because it didn't have a story beyond "princess is in another castle"? not every game has to be serious in the story. as long as its fun to play, which bayonetta totally was.
suck at playing it. it was great. it may not have been your cup of tea, but it was far from being even a bad game. if it was the worst game you've played this gen, i would hate to see what you do play
more substance than most
if you think in terms of worldwide, xbox still wouldve got crushed
EDIT and original xbox never had a three year warranty. neither does 360, just on red ring/e74, but not anything else. and the thing is, "X" in japan is like having a huge "NO" on the box. it was telling japanese not to buy it right on the packaging. thats why when msoft went to 360, they changed the logo to an x inside of a circle.
mat tracks your feet, i have no idea why the camera would even need to track your whole body. its not like its not gonna know where your feet are. but hey. . . KINECT! woo-hoo! or something