There's absolutely no indication that reviewers are biased towards Halo.
Halo 3 - 94/100
Halo Wars - 82/100
Halo 3: ODST - 83/100
Halo: Reach - 92/100
I'm confused here. How is it that "halo gets a bypass just for being halo?" Is it because you feel that your uneducated, unofficial opinion regarding Halo and it's success is more valid than an educated, official opinion, such as one reviewing the game?
I was about to say the same damn thing. How is 256 MB GDDR3 & 256 MB XDR enough RAM? PC video cards have more RAM than the entire console.
Love the games... not the boxart. Everything looks so cluttered.
That's such a radical way of looking at something simple that we cant take what you're saying with anything more than a grain of salt.
BioWare addressed the issues in Mass Effect 2 and knew they were bad. They are now porting it to the PS3, and not doing anything about the issues they know are in the game. That is a con.
Congratulations. You just proved my point.
nickjkl I think I've read enough comments to see that "the ps3 has only been out for two years" and "the ps3 has better graphics, but the 360 has better games".
I don't need to read every comment from an article dating back to 2006 to try and help justify whatever point you're making, even though it's basically moot at this point in time. I mean... it's sort of a no brainer tha...
Playstation fanboys... are just... so stupid. Everything that is remotely questioned about the Playstation franchise results in you being called a fanboy of something. You might as well have called him a Saint's Row 360 fanboy.
Lol it's just Saaking. You can even see it in the name.
Yes... the main review... is the same score.
Donald... who let you back in the house? Go play some ga-...oh...
Uhhh... no? I would suggest going to the bottom of the second page of the link YOU POSTED... (my god...) and looking at the grade. The whole damn site is the review.
I'm not even sure how you came to the conclusion that there was a second opinion on this.
Wow... what?
So many... good... scores... It's beautiful.
He doesn't really know what he's talking about. He's in a daze from all the reviews. He's wandering around N4G mindlessly trying to keep his sanity.
That's odd... why is it that the 360 has more titles rated 90+, and 80+?
If it's a new user buying a new Xbox 360, why would it matter if they were colored before? It's not as if the new user is expecting to have his buttons color coded and memorized straight out of the box.
A color is a color. It tells me to press the "A" button in Metroid: Other M, and it's colored yellow, while the actual remote has no color variant outside of a shade of grey.
The buttons are still colored because previous 360 controllers still work on it.
Killzone 2 is not streamed in terms of what you're talking about, because there are most certainly load times, and they're usually masked by a cutscene.
10/10 and 100/100 have the same value.
Peter Molyneux made his first game when Nomura was only 14. His first game was made 6 years before Shinji Mikami was even part of Capcom (his first company). Kamiya was only 15 at the time, and was made 12 years before his first title was even developed.
You realize the first console made was NOT the Playstation, right?
Do you guys read the reviews or do you just click the article, look at the score and comment? Because 1UP gave it a D (or a 5/10) for the same issues.
Quit bitching. The game of which I still love and can play anytime on my Dreamcast did not age well, especially when they had to opportunity to iron out a few kinks, and instead just increased the resolution of the game.