Don't a lot of the bigger magazines get an advanced copy for review? I have no idea whether you're right or wrong to be perfectly honest, but how do you know that they don't have the game yet? Did they say that?
You just don't want to acknowledge console exclusives so it looks like the 360 has less exclusives than it really does. The PS3/PC combo is great if you're a PC gamer, but the mainstream is console only. And as consoles become more powerful, it will only continue.
There is a change in the wind in here, and it smells like a bucket of sh!t. Xbox has been very innovative. PSN wouldn't be what it is today without Live, and the PS3's ancient controller design might not even have analog trigger buttons if it weren't for the Xbox doing it first.
Wow, there are a lot of people who didn't bother to actually read the article. If you did, you'd see that it's EA thinking about charging for their own demos, not MS thinking about charging for every demo.
To Shaka and the sheep that agreed with him, try reading the article first.
I was relieved to see that this is EA's doing, not MS's. Charging for demos will fail miserably...at least I hope so. Who would be stupid enough to shell out that much for a demo?
I'm officially nominating the Crytek Engine to take the place of the Unreal Engine for the title of Most Used Game Engine. It looks amazing.
BTW, I know that it's fun to obsessively compare versions of games frame by frame, but like most games, that's exactly what you would have to do to notice anything. If you just play it like you should, any differences are hardly noticeable at all.
It looks awesome. Quite a bit more colorful that Gears 1 or 2.
I was under the impression that the PS3 was outselling the 360 in Europe for a while. I didn't realize that the 360 was doing that well in Europe.
N4G is back! Now we all finally have a reason to live again!!! I never knew it took so long to update a website.
XBOX will be just fine. MS has two things that Sony doesn't:
1. The Halo IP.
2. A profitable gaming division.
Don't full yourselves into thinking that MS won't viciously compete.
THC, guess who owns the Halo IP. Go ahead, I'll give you time. I'll give you a hint...not Bungie.
I wonder if Bungie will still develop the next Halo or if MS will allow a different developer to make it.
Don't a lot of the bigger magazines get an advanced copy for review? I have no idea whether you're right or wrong to be perfectly honest, but how do you know that they don't have the game yet? Did they say that?
You just don't want to acknowledge console exclusives so it looks like the 360 has less exclusives than it really does. The PS3/PC combo is great if you're a PC gamer, but the mainstream is console only. And as consoles become more powerful, it will only continue.
Honestly, do most people buy those games for PC? No. They're Microsoft exclusives, but if you want to play them on a console, you have to have a 360.
Oh yeah, and then there's this PS3 owner to. I'm sure he's a true inspiration to you all.
A few gamers like myself are highly intelligent.
Then there are some people like this gentleman, which represents your typical PS3 owner.
I'm an Xbox guy, but I'd have to say Mario is the top video game franchise ever. They have done more with the Mario character than any other.
Does this mean Medal of Honor is poised to become the definitive military shooter now?
There is a change in the wind in here, and it smells like a bucket of sh!t. Xbox has been very innovative. PSN wouldn't be what it is today without Live, and the PS3's ancient controller design might not even have analog trigger buttons if it weren't for the Xbox doing it first.
LOL, got ya Maxx!
Wow, there are a lot of people who didn't bother to actually read the article. If you did, you'd see that it's EA thinking about charging for their own demos, not MS thinking about charging for every demo.
To Shaka and the sheep that agreed with him, try reading the article first.
I was relieved to see that this is EA's doing, not MS's. Charging for demos will fail miserably...at least I hope so. Who would be stupid enough to shell out that much for a demo?
I'm officially nominating the Crytek Engine to take the place of the Unreal Engine for the title of Most Used Game Engine. It looks amazing.
BTW, I know that it's fun to obsessively compare versions of games frame by frame, but like most games, that's exactly what you would have to do to notice anything. If you just play it like you should, any differences are hardly noticeable at all.
Well as stupid as that guy was, does he beat the quintessential PS3 fan?