What a patronising article. Of course I know it's a waste of time, don't talk down to me like you're offering some incredible revelation.
I'm not sure you can call a character that has about 3 lines of dialogue "poorly written", especially given that the rest of the plot was equally minimalist.
And that's better how? He sounds like a youtube commenter.
"Creative risks?" Oh yeah, making your boxart look indistinguishable from every other shooter out there is a huge risk :/
I don't complain about Sony not advertising, as I've said I don't care about adverising, it looks like you did't get my point either.
I'd rather have a bunch of 1st party titles than one with amazing advertising; after all, I'm paying for the game, I'm not interested in how many billboards it gets mentioned on.
You're worrying about AC becoming a yearly thing... years after it became a yearly thing.
I hope it's shaped like a companion cube.
That seems sensible enough, but I doubt children are going to remember Angry Birds in the same way, our society has the internet now, our attention spans are more about looking for the next big thing, spending 5 minutes on it and then moving on.
And that's what I think will happen to Angry Birds; it will be an amusing distraction, a mere footnote compared to legacy of Mario.
Mario was a unique phenomenon; there was nothing like it at the time it came out, and so it left a huge impression on a generation of children.
Angry Birds will not have the same impact because we are living in a society now where gaming is much more mainstream, and where we have seen games like Angry Birds a thousand times before.
Yeah no.
I'm hoping this is a new MGS and not some publicity stunt for Ground Zeroes, it would be kinda pointless to tease a game that has already been announced.
Spyro 2 was up there for awhile years ago, but it didn't actually work- you just get a black screen when you tried to play it. It was the only PSN game I was ever given a refund for.
I kinda wish you'd separate the new gameplay details from the spoilers.
Not really, it was some guy getting offended on behalf of a minority, and then a few tweets. Granted the tweets had more substance to them, but Far Cry 3 is not racist.
Not all innovation is a good thing, Molyneux. There have been plenty of games with original ideas that were crap.
I don't care, not until you announce PS3 owners are getting Dawnguard/Hearthfire too.
If they offer a discount because of the wait.
Hmm, of those #3 (assuming that's not Issacs normal head size), but I still prefer the original art.
We buy the games, we can complain about whatever the hell we want, ziggurcat.