Aither

Member
CRank: 5Score: 34910

@OmnislashVer36 Racial tensions have never been as bad in my life time thanks to Obama. He constantly made comments which were terrible as the president of the free world. You want proof, here it is:

“The Cambridge police acted stupidly in arresting somebody when there was already proof that they were in their own home. . . . What I think we know – separate and apart from this incident – is that there is a long history in their country of African-Americans and Latinos bei...

2810d ago 10 agree23 disagreeView comment

Yeah, Obama created the jobs. That must mean Trump is the best president in history because unemployment is at an all time low 2 years into his presidency. Not to mention the stock market being at an all time high. By your logic, Trump is far greater than Obama.

2810d ago 20 agree29 disagreeView comment

Agreed, always loved his "red lines" he drew which meant nothing when they were constantly crossed. His presidency was a very bad joke.

2810d ago 6 agree19 disagreeView comment

Yes, because we it's not enough politics is everywhere in the real world, we need it dragged into our games. No thanks!

2810d ago 10 agree7 disagreeView comment

Nixon was even better than Obama.

2810d ago 25 agree58 disagreeView comment

Worst president ever! Had more scandals in his administrations than all the previous presidents combined, and that world apology tour, just terrible.

2810d ago 7 agree26 disagreeView comment

Hopefully those aren't finalized character model textures, it looks too last gen.

2812d ago 0 agree10 disagreeView comment

1st link: Russian not English snipers, and you didn't even acknowledge in your own link that states, "Over 2000 women were trained as sharpshooters." This means only 2000 out of 480,000 Russian women who enlisted as nurses, clerks, and cooks were snipers. Now, in case you cannot do the math (because you obviously don't read), that would be .4% of the Russian women enlisted during WW2 were snipers which is extremely negligible. The English government was strict on not having ...

2812d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Exactly the point, Valkyria Chronicles was never labeled as a WWI game. It was a fantasy setting with realistic overtones, but it was never made to be a WWI based game like EA and Dice is labeling Battlefield V to take place in WWII. It doesn't matter if the characters in games are men or women, what matters is the developers are respectful to the sources they are sourced from, especially if they historical events.

2818d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

That is a gameplay element and has no relation with the authenticity of WW2 history. Dice has clearly said they don't care about authenticity and will focus on "Diversity and Inclusion" which is the sole reason for all the backlash they are receiving. They no longer care about their World War games being historically accurate because they are so involved with the PC nonsense being pushed by the SJW minority they are willing to rewrite history for it.

2818d ago 1 agree3 disagreeView comment

So people who are not fine with rewriting history are considered snowflakes now? SJW's are always obsessed with feelings of inclusion over facts and accuracy, and that is what makes you a snowflake. Some of us actually care about how a war our GRANDFATHERS (not grandmothers) fought and died in is portrayed.

2818d ago 4 agree4 disagreeView comment

See, here is the problem EA, you set up previous Battlefields to be inspired by historical events. Yet, with Battlefield V you now put "fun over authentic" which sounds like an excuse from all the criticism you are getting. If you don't want Battlefield to be a game based on historical events as you marketed in the past, then don't claim this is a WW2 setting!

2819d ago 17 agree5 disagreeView comment

EA just jumped the shark with this one.

2819d ago 12 agree0 disagreeView comment

gangsta_red, the reason people are calling the article clickbait is because it is clickbait. You merely need to read the first paragraph to figure that out. It is fine to criticize or express a bad opinion of something you don't like, but to flat out nitpick about faults that are not there solely for hits on a website is something harsh and unfair. Is GoW 4 hard? Sure, but you can simply lower the difficulty if the higher setting is too much for you. Put it simply, the game is no ordinary...

2839d ago 12 agree1 disagreeView comment

gangsta_red, is expressing an opinion about a bad review latent with grammatical errors considered an "attack" now? Huh, modern trends never cease to surprise me.

2839d ago 24 agree1 disagreeView comment

Septic, sorry to say but this is why people call you an internet troll. When you mock the community, who are speaking their mind over what is obviously a bad "review" you only hurt yourself in the process. What you fail to realize is the community is right about the reviewer based on what he said and how GoW 4 is clearly a game deserving more than a six out of ten. While everyone is entitled to their opinion, sometimes an opinion can be wrong. A game as polished and expansive as GoW...

2840d ago 19 agree1 disagreeView comment

Don't give this site any clicks. The more views they get the more relevant they become, just ignore them and they will away.

2849d ago 14 agree3 disagreeView comment

If employees are offered a better position with more pay, why wouldn't they go with Epic games? If Cliff Bleszinski wants to keep his employees, all he has to do is offer them a better deal.

2855d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

Can't we just take a step back and focus on the present instead of always looking into the future. For crying out loud, 2018 has just begun and there are so many great PS4 games yet to be released this year.

2858d ago 10 agree1 disagreeView comment

That's Polygon for you.

2859d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment