Naughty Dog was my favorite developer for the longest time. After they fired Amy Hennig and kept on Neil (Anita pawn) Druckmann, it's obvious they've taken a turn for the worst. Not buying another ND game until they shape up and stop with this SJW bull****!
Yes, when there is a pandemic in the works, manufacturing countries like China will only care about themselves. This is why it's important for the US and other countries to make their own products again, so there won't be a shortage of medicine or other goods when a crisis occurs.
Don't know why you would get so many dislikes, other than from people who just have spite for President Trump.
It's funny how all those people who called sceptics of this obvious fake "gamer girl" to be sexist have suddenly gone silent. This story alone has shined a light on these so called "journalists" who have no characteristics of what the word even means. People who just throw out the word sexist, misogynist, racist, etc. wouldn't know truth if it came up and bit them in the rear end like this story did.
It's mind blowing why you are getting so many dislikes. This is regarding a new generation of consoles that needs to last a minimum of 5 years into 2025, 16 GB is the least amount of ram Next Generation consoles should have.
SenorFartCushion, using the good 'ol AAA excuse. Sorry to burst your bubble, but this is not some unknown game being released against heavy hitters. Battlefield is a AAA franchise and your reasoning is not a good excuse for it's bad sales numbers. EA is sinking, and DICE becoming a woke subsidiary of the company is just an anchor that is helping to pull it under.
N4GSINCEBEGINNING, it's called rewriting history. Ever heard of that?
Surely someone as educated and woke as you should've known about a certain group who once rewrote history to claim themselves to be a master race. You may have heard of them, they were called Nazis.
ProLogY, the Battlefield V game didn't tell about the women who were in the Russian sniper squad, nor the French Resistance fighters. What it did was literally rewrite history regarding a squad of Norwegian commandos replacing it instead with a story about a girl and her mother. So, if you had said that BFV takes historical events that actually happened and molested them to fit a SJW BS narrative, you would've been more accurate.
It was a failed game from the start. Not only did the developers force politics into it, but its beta was a catastrophe. Upon its release it was littered with bugs and its upgrade system is a complete mess. If people like the game then fine, but don't undermine those who are finding valid criticism with it as "haters" or whatnot.
Just another NPC crying out how the orange man is bad. Battlefield V was doomed when it became a CoD clone by turning away from its roots. You wanna buy the game, then by all means more power to you. However, insulting others for their opinion is not going to change the fact it is a little better than average game which the developers told their customers who didn't believe in their propaganda not to buy.
Everyone who disagrees with changing history (game or not) is not alt right. What you said doesn't defend the comments of the EA developer in anyway, it's just another strawman argument.
Completely miss the fact how the developer insulted an entire fan-base and literally told them not to buy the game. It is crazy times when people make such absurd comments without doing a little research.
Looks does not equal functionality. If someone includes a model of a P-51 Mustang in the game, but makes it function like an F-35 Lightning II, would that be historically accurate to you as well? A prosthetic arm during that time does not work the way it did in the Battlefield V trailer. Even with modern technology prosthetic limbs are not combat ready.
If you need further proof, here is a historical video on the matter:
Sorry, just not feeling it. While it may be a neat feature, it's not what Nvidia hyped it to be. Would've rather had stronger performance graphics cards at cheaper prices than gimmicky lighting features. However, it is curious to see the 2000 series graphic cards Nvidia is releasing include both RTX and GTX. Maybe this will form into two separate lines of graphic card series.
Albeit a 16% difference is not nearly as good as the 30% difference consumers are used to seeing, it is still a pretty marginal gap in power if it does turn out to be a general 2080 and not the Ti variant. However, that said it really is a minuscule power increase given it has taken nearly 2 years since Pascals release. Hopefully this isn't an omen of what to expect in future releases.
Yes, when there is a pandemic in the works, manufacturing countries like China will only care about themselves. This is why it's important for the US and other countries to make their own products again, so there won't be a shortage of medicine or other goods when a crisis occurs.
Don't know why you would get so many dislikes, other than from people who just have spite for President Trump.
It's funny how all those people who called sceptics of this obvious fake "gamer girl" to be sexist have suddenly gone silent. This story alone has shined a light on these so called "journalists" who have no characteristics of what the word even means. People who just throw out the word sexist, misogynist, racist, etc. wouldn't know truth if it came up and bit them in the rear end like this story did.
It's mind blowing why you are getting so many dislikes. This is regarding a new generation of consoles that needs to last a minimum of 5 years into 2025, 16 GB is the least amount of ram Next Generation consoles should have.
The DICE ship sinks deeper into the depths of the abyss.
SenorFartCushion, using the good 'ol AAA excuse. Sorry to burst your bubble, but this is not some unknown game being released against heavy hitters. Battlefield is a AAA franchise and your reasoning is not a good excuse for it's bad sales numbers. EA is sinking, and DICE becoming a woke subsidiary of the company is just an anchor that is helping to pull it under.
N4GSINCEBEGINNING, it's called rewriting history. Ever heard of that?
Surely someone as educated and woke as you should've known about a certain group who once rewrote history to claim themselves to be a master race. You may have heard of them, they were called Nazis.
ProLogY, the Battlefield V game didn't tell about the women who were in the Russian sniper squad, nor the French Resistance fighters. What it did was literally rewrite history regarding a squad of Norwegian commandos replacing it instead with a story about a girl and her mother. So, if you had said that BFV takes historical events that actually happened and molested them to fit a SJW BS narrative, you would've been more accurate.
Sorry if the truth hurts you so much.
It was a failed game from the start. Not only did the developers force politics into it, but its beta was a catastrophe. Upon its release it was littered with bugs and its upgrade system is a complete mess. If people like the game then fine, but don't undermine those who are finding valid criticism with it as "haters" or whatnot.
If anything, it will only make things worse for them.
Just another NPC crying out how the orange man is bad. Battlefield V was doomed when it became a CoD clone by turning away from its roots. You wanna buy the game, then by all means more power to you. However, insulting others for their opinion is not going to change the fact it is a little better than average game which the developers told their customers who didn't believe in their propaganda not to buy.
One of these things is not like the others.
@lipton101
Everyone who disagrees with changing history (game or not) is not alt right. What you said doesn't defend the comments of the EA developer in anyway, it's just another strawman argument.
Get woke, go broke.
Completely miss the fact how the developer insulted an entire fan-base and literally told them not to buy the game. It is crazy times when people make such absurd comments without doing a little research.
@zuggurcat
2706d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment
Looks does not equal functionality. If someone includes a model of a P-51 Mustang in the game, but makes it function like an F-35 Lightning II, would that be historically accurate to you as well? A prosthetic arm during that time does not work the way it did in the Battlefield V trailer. Even with modern technology prosthetic limbs are not combat ready.
If you need further proof, here is a historical video on the matter:
Sorry, just not feeling it. While it may be a neat feature, it's not what Nvidia hyped it to be. Would've rather had stronger performance graphics cards at cheaper prices than gimmicky lighting features. However, it is curious to see the 2000 series graphic cards Nvidia is releasing include both RTX and GTX. Maybe this will form into two separate lines of graphic card series.
Albeit a 16% difference is not nearly as good as the 30% difference consumers are used to seeing, it is still a pretty marginal gap in power if it does turn out to be a general 2080 and not the Ti variant. However, that said it really is a minuscule power increase given it has taken nearly 2 years since Pascals release. Hopefully this isn't an omen of what to expect in future releases.