Okay, no skill required. So why don't you join the MLG pro gamers and participate in esports, coz, you can win millions in prices!!! You can just hop in and be the best.
But sadly, only in your dreams. If you haven't played COD before or play it occassionally, you will be raped by experienced COD players. Just try it and you'll see.
You are the dumb fck COD hater on this forum, all you do is hate on every COD article, losers like you need help, it's too late though because you are like majority of the readers of this site, pin head dummies.
Everything you mentioned above are stupid crap, did you really play COD? Or is it you are nothing but another hate fool?
Dumb article. It is more like Homefront ripped off COD MW2. COD MW2 have you fighting in your neighborhood against foreign armies. MW2 brought the fight right in the States. Homefront simply use this as a plot and tried to add lackluster drama.
Really? Mediocre less than 6 hrs SP? MP became a BF wanna be that failed to lift off? PS2 like graphics? Didn't you get the memo that it was a terrible game reviewed by reputable game sites? That it forced it's publisher to close down the studio that developed it? The publisher then subsequently filed for bankruptcy?
Oh, I get it it, you are nothing but a troll.
okay then, enjoy the netcode of BF4.
And who are you?
How can it be his opinion if he said it himself that's what he heard from others about this game? Check the definition of opinion.
Because of the internet, everybody can write whatever he pleases and this undermines journalism to a high extent. Just like this article, "I
ve been told that this game is this" and so he claimed that this game is a snooze fest. Talking about dodgy writers and dodgy sites, Geez..
Let's see, somebody said that he finished it in 4 hours and has a screenshot of the last mission. And this is solid proof for this site? This is actually a ploy to get this article mileage or exposure, journalism at its lowest. Dodgy writers.
For one, early reviewers of the game definitely says the campaign is much longer than 4 hours.
You have mental issues, child. This is only a video game, if you don't like it, forget it or ignore it.
This footage is Xbox360, and so the quality is not as good as the next gen footage, or the graphics from BF4 running on a supercharged PC. I have been playing BF4 on xbox360, and mind you, the graphics is as bad as BF3 if not worst, and that is, if you don't mind rebooting your console every now and then because BF4 freezes your console.
Neogaf? The sony fanboys? Cool source.
You all three sound like EAs marketing people, and that is why EA will always be the most hated company in america.
It is known that neogaf is pro sony, nothing more nothing less.
So more detail is now called jaggies?
And who are you?
I agree, objectively the x1 looks a bit better or bit more detail than ps4. I am on the wait list, i want to see the actual results from the wild before deciding what next gen to choose.
They said they have to tweaked something on the ps4 capture to get better contrast but none on the x1. But still honestly, just looking at the video and ignoring the opinions of the 2 guys, the x1 is a bit better. I am on the wait list for next gen, i prefer to get actual feedback in the wild before deciding which one.
The dumbness of this article is beyond belief.