Yeah, actually, it is. So why didn't you have that link when you reported the article? None of this was even necessary.
Of what? You need a link.
"In the PS2 era I never got to enjoy Ratchet & Clank, Sly Cooper or Jak & Daxter, probably because they didn't get as much hype as 3rd party exclusives like MGS2, FFX, DMC, GTA, etcetera."
That's the dumbest ****ing thing I've seen all day except for the HHG bull****. What the **** does hype have to do with one's enjoyment of a game?
Did you seriously just group Marvel Ultimate Alliance with the real RPGs, and then toss in WKC when it's only out in ONE REGION?
You're living fantasies.
Yeah, I just noticed that too. It seems to me that it's "lame" to them because it doesn't talk about MS as if they walk on water and raise the dead. It's pretty sad.
Well researched, well written, and makes a LOT of good points. Well done.
Couldn't have said it better myself. That's exactly it. Just because MS tosses money about like it's confetti, everyone seems to think that's normal behavior. They are wrong. I guess it's easy when you're MS and you only have maybe 3 or 4 1st/2nd party games coming out in a year; you have all the money in the world to advertise with. Sony has more first party studios to worry about.
From the article:
"Nintendo is famous for their casual and family-friendly ...
...exactly how many reports does it take to get a story to go away? This is absurd. This article is nothing but flamebait, which, given the source, should surprise NO ONE, people are reporting it because, again, it's nothing but flamebait, and yet, the story is still here.
I would like it explained to me why that is.
That was harsh, but the man is right.
"Wii players are "little kids and old people" and "hardcore Nintendo fanboys..."
EXACTLY what I've been saying about the Wii for a year. Not that there's anything wrong with that, but the Wii is what it is.
but based on what Game Informer said about this game, I think it's going to be stupid. I hope I'm wrong, but this game seems to have been made as a result of focus group testing, not what would make a good game.
Those days are long past.
I fail to see how I could possibly agree more.
Yeah, so? They aren't talking about PlayOn either, and that blows the 360's little NetFlix deal out of the water. Or are you one of those people that need to be spoon-fed?
Having said that, I would LOOOOVE to see a SH1 remake.
Good point.
The rumored price drop is a rumor? Never would have figured that one out on my own. Thank you so very much for clarifying that.
Things always "could" be better, and that applies to anything. That goes without saying. It might be lacking in features right now, but Rome wasn't built in a day. This is a HUGE undertaking, and I give props to Sony for attempting.
This actually got approved? Why?
Yeah, they were. You're right; it DOES go both ways. Best thing to do is simply ignore it and move on, because this ain't the first nor will it be the last.
Do that.