"The 360 bundle has a 250gb HDD about a $200 value and MW2 $70 and an extra controller $30. Those 3 are the same value as the Slim so an Elite with MW2, 250gb HDD, two wireless controllers, full backwards compat and access to Live and Netflix at $399 is a hell of alot sexier."
Wait, what? " full backwards compat"?
Huh? Not only is Xbox 360 not "full backwards compat", there aren't nearly as many Xbox 1 titles worth buying among the 50% o...
Wow, they seriously weren't kidding when they said you are retarded.
Quality doesn't always equal sales, it requires plenty of marketing, and by that I don't only mean publicity, I mean reaching a target audience; psychonauts, Okami, ICO, etcetera would have sold better if they were about a retarded green power ranger that tries to pass off its story as "just as good as star wars" (LMFAO). But anyway, a lot of developers have been inspired by these games, so much that ...
The gameplay looks boring. I mean, JRPGs have really not aged well. They said they wanted gameplay with a little more action to it, and this is all they could come up with?
I hope Versus is better in terms of gameplay, like Kingdom Hearts.
ODST may do something new, doesn't it have a new mode?
Reach may also sell systems if its graphics engine impresses and if Natal is a requirement to play it
Halo two moved systems
So instead of addressing his point (actually listing 360 exclusives instead of multiplatform games mentioned) you gotta resort to ad hominems.
As usual.
And that's not what Cevat Yerli said; he actually said that between PS3, 360 and PC, the top tier version is the one on PS3. Not surprising though, if you see the video comparison of the demo the 360 version takes a lot longer to load.
Can't you read?
"See? Anyone can do that. "
I was making an ass of myself on purpose just to see if shocky can learn something about not being an ass, but I guess Reading comprehension isn't your strength. lmao, this site is too funny. But hey, at least you can take solace in the fact that you're not as slow a learner as shocky, you learned to state IN MY OPINION. Good for you, sport.
There is Halo though. LMAO, weak list.
Edit:
Why is KOTOR even on that list? I'm guessing this list was made by a very young gamer or an Xbox fanboy or ex-pc gamer as Mario is too low, there's no Mario 64 or Mario Galaxy or Mario 3 or whatever, no Zelda. Hell, very few Nintendo games made that list. I would put Shadow of the Colossus or ICO before Halo anyday, same with all the Nintendo games. Hell, I'd put Gears of War before Halo even if it's Killswitch with bett...
"Especially after how average the first game was, amazing graphics though. "
Well, it does everything gears attempted to do except better, plus it has platforming and puzzle elements, not to mention it doesn't rely on the old Alien/WW2 formula. But I'm guessing you think Gears of War is one of the best games ever made (lmao).
Isn't Halo another Doom clone anyway? Here, let me give you my review of the whole Halo franchise in a single paragraph since that's ...
Not all PS3 owners feel that way just like some Xbox owners feel that way. The writer is a retard, you can tell how he is a poor attempt at journalism with the use of the ambiguous term "something" and an question mark at the end. But hey, let's play devil's advocate for a second...
What IF all PS3 owners felt like they're entitled to "something"? After all, the great majority of PS3 owners are former PS2 owners, many of which bought the PS2 for the fact that ...
How convenient for you to equate quality to sales, but what about all those JRPG flops on 360? Bad games?
Games sell because they get the job done. Halo sells because it's a household name, not because it's that good. Halo was the only good game on Xbox for a while which is why it made a name of itself. Also, FPS, RTS and WRPGs sell a lot because th Xbox fanbase is comprised by many ex-PC gamers. Games that sell a lot on Playstation are games that have a legacy, like MGS, reside...
So much for your dumb post. Anyway, even if it was pre-rendered, they made it all real time because CGI takes too much space for your measly DVD9 to be used. Using it on PS3 would have made the amount of discs on 360 too high and expensive; using CGI only on PS3 would be unacceptable to MSFT. So even if it was al pre-rendered footage (not saying it was) it would have made the cut had it been a PS3 exclusive. But that is something you 360 fangirls will never admit.
You expect them to say 360 is inferior? LMAO
Blame Square for their poor management for being incompetent instead of PS3 owners for having high standards because that's what we're used to.
:)
You wanted 8 first year 360 titles that were good and you got more, why list more PS3 games? Good boy, You can also research 360 titles
Sony undermined the 360 by dropping PS3s price, making it look inferior and Microsoft take desperate measures.
Statistically speaking, it won't help sales. It's unlikely that anyone was waiting for the 360 to be released with 2 controllers, a 250 GB HDD and bundled with COD4's sequel. And by unlikely I'm not saying it's impossible, I'm just saying that the amount of people buying the 360 for these particular bundle are very few. Most would have bought the 360 anyway and found this deal better than the $299 "Elite". It's merely sweetening the deal for those that were going to buy the game, th...