I've had my experiences with some Wii fanboys, there aren't as many but they have to be the worst.
How they included Xbox live arcade games for the 360's total games, but didn't include PSN titles for the ps3's total games. M$(Don mattick) has to be the biggest d***heads of the industry.
Don Mattick has got to be the biggest d*ckhead of the gaming industry. So he included Xbox live titles on the 360's total number of games but didn't include PSN titles for the ps3. He is one of the many reasons I will never buy a Xbox.
No, you are not the only person, It didn't do it for any other game though, they must no that KZ2 will be great.
I heard that those new projects (not halo) that bungie was working on are going to be multiplatform, MS and bungie aren't getting along these days.
So what crawled up your ass?
You do know that M$ didn't get those because they have a great console, its because M$ had to pay up. And you also say we "babbons" won't enjoy them, well FYI there all multiplatfor so we all get to enjoy themJ
Just like a Fanboy to brag about multiplatforms.
There already is, but its not made by Naughty Dog :-(, They haven't made a Crash game since the ps1, all of them since they sold haven't been any good.
Whoo
I haven't played the first one yet but it has been on my to do list for some time though. I really hope they announce a new Jak for 09, then my life would be complete.
Naughty Dog is one reason I choose the ps3.
Same here
Naughty Dog FTW!!!!!!
Hopefully not, Jak is one of my all time favorite franchises and I am really looking forward to a new Jak game. I would like Jak4/5 more than another Uncharted, than again I haven't played Uncharted yet, I need to get it.
MS did patent in game music, I've seen documents.
SONY has to make it up to the developer if they want to use it, and I'm pretty sure that the developer has to pay royalties to MS if they want to use it. I'm not sure of everything about haw SONY was able to get in game music though.
http://www.ripten.com/2008/...
PSN has almost 10 million members now, 9.8 million as of June 26. Live has been around since the original Xbox, PSN has only been around less than 2 years. What was that about hard to catch up?
http://www.ps3fanboy.com/20...
http://kotaku.com/5019817/j...
Your just in denial, makeing up lies to make yourself think you made a good purchase, well FYI, the only game the 360 has this year or next is Gears 2, other than that you pretty much screwed.
6 YEARS?????LOL!!!! I'm sorry but thats just funny,$300 down the drain
You failed to mention that the psp, ps3, ds and Wii all have built in Wifi, What about the 360?
I am not saying paying for the service itself is wrong, I honestly don't know why SONY doesn't do it, but it is wrong when all your competitors do it for free, And I will admit LIVE is better, as far as features go, but it is not $50 better, maybe $25-$30 better, but not a whole game(almost) better. And charging for wallpapers is just ridiculous, especially when you already charge for the online service.
So does PSN, as well as better games.
EDIT:
All are wallpapers and themes are free, unlike LIVE. I mean WTF? You charge $50 a year yet they still charge you for wallpapers and themes. Somethings wrong there.
But nobody trash talks on PSN, I like it when not every one has a mic.
Maybe they don't want to take the time and wait for their computer to boot up
I don't know if you realized this but in the 360's total game they included Live Arcade games and for the ps3 PSN games weren't included.
You need to take a closer look at the article, theres a lot of stuff your not getting