These pseudo realism/arcade shooters are so boring to me these days, Id buy neither and instead il stick to developers who listen to their communities like the Red Orchestra series and the Arma series.
looking good, but Im going to need a stalingrad map for red orchestra 2 complete with tiger tanks etc or maybe even one step furthr and kursk.
Battlefield never should have done single players and just stuck to the PC, that way it wouldn't be th watered down restricted experience it is now.
Yes because graphics are really the most important part of any game........
please go.
lol please make an above average game before talking crytek.
the most promising game made on the cry engine isn't even by crytek, It is Star Citezen and everyone should check it out.
this game is pretty bad but a good idea that just lacks overall polish.
Primal Carnage is a much better game and that lets you play as dinosaurs.
Just dont make any shooters codemasters, stick to racing titles.
War Thunder pushed boundaries by introducing a flight sim experience to a broader audience, It also evolved in game economies seen in games like world of tanks and it has evolved the free to play marketplace.
Natural selection 2 is a unique blend of RTS and FPS like a blend of counterstrike and starcraft if you will and it pushes methods of teamwork with a commander relying on the FPS players and vice versa.
Chivalry is one of the very few first or third pers...
Will play but I really will need to hook up my PS3 controller to play this one for PC.
Cannot stand that xbox D pad for fighters.
Never buying another product from EA again crew checking in.
Tell me, what did you think I meant by "I prefer."
War Thunder, Natural Selection II, Chivalry Medieval Warfare, Company of heroes series, Primal Carnage, eurotruck simulator (lol), farming simulator (further lols), Arma II & III, warframe, Hawken, Carrier Command, Skyrim (modded), Planetside 2, Red Orchestra 2, Star Conflict, Sins of a solar empire rebellion.
And those are just some taken from my steam library not to mention the thousands of games getting pushed through on greenlight and the large number of independent g...
Do you know if this pokemon game with have generation 1 pokemon?
It seems to have machamp, garados, eve, pikachu, clam pokemon (cant remember its name).
It seems to!
I don't like either, they are both generic modern military games that lack any real depth or tactical play.
I prefer the Arma series and Red Orchestra series when it comes to shooters.
It is hard to call, PS3 has the last of us and PS4 is out......the PC also has some sleeping giants like Company of Heroes 2 and Rome Total War II and quite possibly star citizen (more than likely 2014 though) and one simply cannot forget GTA V even if I thought the last one was disappointing.
I appreciate PC's graphical potential but I'm far more into independent titles and indie games that can be found nowhere else.
Basically PC exclusives is what I have a PC for, I like the better frame rate and the higer res for multiplatforms but the unique deep and complex games is the draw for me.
Can anyone confirm if these versions of pokemon have all the original pokemon in them?
would not like to jump through hoops to get the pokemon I know and love.
Well done generalising an entire demographic of millions of people into one opinion.
I will be buying a PS4 for the single players and JRPGs but yes I will still spend 80% of my gaming time on PC as it is my preferred platform.
Nintendo achieved the greatest exclusive of this gen...an aliens colonial marines cancellation....LOL
I did play it back in the day but Not anymore, looking forward to Red Orchestra Rising Storm though!