CRank: 5Score: 32570

How else was he/she suppose to acquire a ps4?it's not like we have a bartering system or some work exchange.

4698d ago 4 agree4 disagreeView comment

The ps4 camera supposedly has a wider field of view and has a higher fps.

4699d ago 4 agree12 disagreeView comment

You can't be serious? The biggest difference between the two is,image quality,likely to change and lighting.

4699d ago 34 agree7 disagreeView comment

The ps4 gpu,I believe was based on the radeon 7970m,a mobile version of radeon 7870 but in stead of 1ghz for the desktop and 850MHz for the mobile version.

4700d ago 4 agree0 disagreeView comment

It actually in between both card in terms of specs.

4700d ago 4 agree7 disagreeView comment

@ jameson That's because the development cycle for pc to console in not efficient,know with the ps4 and presumably the next box this shouldn't be a problem.

4701d ago 0 agree4 disagreeView comment

Right consoles held this level of graphics back,not the fact there is no standard for gaming PCs,drives problems,API overhead and every two years there is a new gpu gen,no,none if that contributes to being held back but consoles.

4701d ago 16 agree8 disagreeView comment

You can sign in with ps eye now,their is YouTube video of it.

4703d ago 5 agree0 disagreeView comment

@lvl no,there was a kinect like camera for the ps2/ps3 that had games,excluding the trolls,kinect did more harm for the core xbox gamer than good,it took away from core games being made by Ms first party studios,it didn't work the way it was unveiled to the masses and didn't enhance gameplay much,wether you like the move or not it was better for a variety of games than kinect will ever be.

4703d ago 4 agree4 disagreeView comment

I'm assuming it's not going to be priced high as kinect 2,the benefits for the ps quadro with probably,YouTube videos,video conference with friends,voice chatting and some games related stuff,assuming it is cheaper than the next gen kinect,plus it would not take focus away from core games like kinect did with the 360.

4703d ago 5 agree1 disagreeView comment

@good he'd would still be wrong as the games he compared are still new ip's in comparison to mario and Zelda

@jcn I'm not sure about gt but ever other Sony games are direct sequels to the games that came before instead of a new installment in a franchise.

4706d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment

No he doesn't,the biggest difference between Sony and nintendo is,nintendo hasn't done any thing new game wise while Sony has.

@ichigo I said game wise not gameplay and the same could be said for nintendo.

4706d ago 31 agree26 disagreeView comment

The saga and collection basically are the same thing. For the disagree the saga contains gow 3 and the collection doesn't .

4706d ago 16 agree11 disagreeView comment

No,nvidia is wrong,any thing above a 660ti is an "enthusiast" card meaning the cost is more to run at higher than normal resolutions,the ps4 gpu is a mid-high.

4706d ago 2 agree16 disagreeView comment

With a metal hand.

4706d ago 20 agree4 disagreeView comment

Glad it was a joke and no guy showed him what a "bigdaddy " is.

4707d ago 12 agree0 disagreeView comment

That's ushers,song scream.

4707d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

It's like ooh,baby,baby.

4707d ago 2 agree4 disagreeView comment

@mush black is kinda right bf3 had better effect in comparison to the 360 and portal on the ps3 was the best console version even though the developing time was the same.

4709d ago 6 agree18 disagreeView comment

Jamal you're not being a good guy.

4710d ago 3 agree1 disagreeView comment