No the internet says hi
Rule 34, no exception all games haves nsfw pics
@Tsar
HGST is the brand of the harddrive
I would much rather pirate this game and send Nintendo a $100 check than to give GS $70
Took the words right out of my mouth. 5400RPM in 2013 is laughable though I'm pretty sure if Sony had use 7200RPM or SSD the cost would be higher.
@Lukas_Japonicus
Yes
Photos: http://www.ign.com/articles...
The cost and different people was in charge. Also it was different company 20yrs ago.
I'm more curious to why they would use a old build dating all the way back to E3 rather than the final product?
By now most all these games should have went gold.
Hackers gone too far. It would be silly to pin it on Xbox fans or Sony fans.
More competition is better but Onlive really won't make a huge difference at this point.
-Sony got Gaikai
-MS got cloud servers
-It would be cheaper in the long to build yourself a pc than to subscribe to a game streaming service.
The CEO acted childish and they weren't profiting anything. Originally EA was suppose to do a exclusive deal with Onlive but ended up doing Gaikai instead. To respond to this Onlive CEO ordered all EA games be remove. Not only that but any game that was on Gaikai, the CEO wouldn't allow to be on Onlive.
For more information
http://www.theverge.com/201...
The guy's trolling must not be that bad if he got 7 bubble.
I've seen people with 5 bubbles go down to 1 bubble in day.
@B-radical
There was glitch in the system a few months back that a lot of people 5 bubbles. Going from 5 bubbles to 7 isn't that hard.
How amazing or awesome the game looks is a matter of opinion.
Though I will admit the game definitely has improve visually since when it was shown at E3 2011.
At $50 bucks on the WiiU I don't know it will sell a lot. Though $20 bucks on ps3, 360 and pc along with the discount definitely will help.
X1 is R$ 2,200
PS4 is R$ 3,999
My guess is MS must got a factory or something down their to avoid fees and import taxes.
The import taxes and fees is what killing Sony when it comes to price.
Unless they can get some of the people that left SE(like the series creator for instance) on board in this committee, it will be pointless.
I rather they have a low expectation for their own games than some absurd high expectation for their games like SE.
They will have the same lifespan the up coming generation as well. This is nothing more than clickbait to get fanboys fighting each other.
Why not give buyers the option to choose a different game, Watchdog voucher or downgrade?
Something telling me when the sells don't reach 6.2million Ubisoft will pull a SE and deem the game a failure.
Well these probably won't be put into the next gen console 1-2 years. This gen we seen CPU and GPU process go from 90nm to 45nm. Both next gen consoles are starting out at 28nm. I wonder how low will next gen goes before this generation is over.