he'd be willing to take over the Socom ip?! awesome,please let that happen too.
i will be all over this game,once funded that is.
for real,we all should get it ,not clans team killing own team-mates to retrieve it
that sux,peeps with no clan will be heavily targeted
well if BF3 was as good as predecessors i would maybe agree but Bad Company 2 was a better Battlefield than BF3.
meaning;it's BF3 all over again except with nicer graphics / destruction
oh and this; "LMGs and sniper rifles will suppress you if they pass near your head so they have better suppressing effects",means still won't kill if it's a direct hit but you get plenty of assist kills lol
uh oh,EA has to revise all over,doh!!
precisely,i like your idea!!
@ bobtheimpaler
wel it dont have to be that way if they took the time to make it good
@ snipab8t
no duh but not the same games
why don't EA take their own medicine,balance out Battlefields so one isn't dominant over the other ;-)
Bad Company 3 should of been out before BF4
what does Just Cause have to do wth Mad Max? MM should have both options.
that sucks,wanted to battle with friends on the wide open roads
we need gameplay video
so more is ok all the sudden?
it does for me,same old weapons / features beside Commander mode don't do it totally for me. sure i like better graphics and destruction but for me it's player gameplay first.
@ alexmac
not for me,maybe for others though. that feature is cool but i'm a foot / vehicle soldier player first.
i want player info,will we get more weapon choices,until then,to me it's just BF3.9 (extra .4 points for better destruction) with enhanced graphics.
sweet
wait,wouldn't that change what they're saying now,since they imply their cloud has better specs than their competition? specs will matter to them then? you can't help to feel sorry for all the 'foot in mouth' talk Microsoft has been implying lately,what's up with that?