He was barely present during the game, did nothing but talk when he showed up, and the ending fight against him was lackluster af. "One of the best"? As if
I wanted it in multiplayer since that one section in BF3. always thought it would help prevent being revived only to be killed in the same spot because of medics running around rezzing without making sure it's clear to do in the first place
They aren't random though, and I think that's part of the problem. All those anime characters were all in previous games and had plenty of screen time for character development. They were just under used and their importance was down played
The conclusion of Cloud vs Sephiroth maybe never actually be concluded. And Zack's introduction in BBS will be for nothing it seems
There really needs to be a standard set for photo mode features next gen. Take all the good stuff from Horizon and The Order and other really good photo modes
Single player games aren't being killed at all. Look at how many multiplayer only games have had a single player added when a sequel was made. Titanfall comes to mind, which happens to also be made by Respawn.
If it were laggy wouldn't the image blurr? Cause when remote play is lagging out it looks super pixelated on my VITA screen. Looks fake tbh, which wouldn't be surprising as MS has faked demos in the past
Understandable, but regardless of what your opinion may be I think this game has every right to exist. I think some things should just not be made, unless you're doing it for something other than shock factor. Kinda doubt that there's a legit reason for this games existence tho
Keep in mind what happened with the first MW remaster. You can like the series all you want, but Activision doesn't deserve the money
15 bucks off is like the best you can get with Nintendo games on Switch. I always laugh when I see one of their games on sale and it's only 3 dollars less
Personally don't think Breath of the Wild is the type of game to replay from the beginning a second time. There's no "awesome" story that's worth replaying, and the game is too repetitive and tedious. I like just going back and sight seeing occasionally.
"Eventually be fantastic" don't you think after 6 or 7 years of development that it should've been fantastic from the get go? Don't kid yourself. Like Destiny and The Division they'll just move on to the sequel.
Nothing against Pokemon Go but it ain't relevant anymore, and other than inspiring Let's Go spin-off it ain't done nothing to move the series forward. Pokemon was huge before Go and will continue being after.
How can they be returning to something they've never stopped making?
I didn't like Let's GO, definitely not the change I wanted for Pokemon. I just simply want the world to be open similar to Ni No Kuni, Pokemon to be seen roaming around, and turn based battles to have more flashier animations. I don't think want I want is that drastic of a change tbh
Agree 100% that random encounters shouldn't have returned. Seeing the comments here tho it's easy to see why the series hasn't changed drastically over the years, the fans want more of the same. Hope to see them someday make something in the style of the first Ni No Kuni. But if they keep making more of the same then I'm simply done with the series.
I need to see more. It's easy to to be excited because of its visuals, but I'm not too excited about them going back to random encounters and fixed cameras. The Switch can do so much more than the 3DS so they really needa wow me when they show it off at E3 or it's a no buy
That's pretty crazy to me. It's not usual to see a company publicly announce that it's breaking it's contract and admit to feeling disappointed. Disney could learn something from these guys
exp sharing and the Pokeball aside, the only lesson to be learned is to not be anything like Let's Go.
Think most tend to blame the publisher actually, specially when said publisher has a history of breathing down your neck. I agree with Fox, there needs to be more communication between Dev and publisher, and more understanding from the publisher.