Did these idiots not learned about Konami's "MONTH OF MADNESS" failure?
No pigeons in the cover? IMMA SUE YOU EA!
Let me ask you this if it's so stale why is it that it kicks every other games butt every year ??
I mean are the millions of fans of the series
just wrong because you don't care for it?
The f*** you talkin' about? Ain't no COD game since MW2 even beat a game since. Sales don't count.
So basically you're saying that Hollywood shouldn't give up on Twilight nor Fifty Shades of Grey just because they made millions.
"Play Rainbow Six Siege."
I don't play online multiplayer focused games with Microtransactions. The way Ethos put it out in "A Case Study On Microtransactions," I'll never touch this game.
Rainbow six siege has cosmetic microtransactions that can also be unlocked with in-game currency." Oh, so long does it take to unlock a cosmetic? For me in games like Bayonetta with in-game currency, it took me less than 4 hours to buy t...
You just admitted that you paid to skip progression to get somewhere. That is not gaming, in that case and I'm sorry to say. If this is your method of gaming, I hope you never play games for the rest of your life considering you no regrets.
Ethos dissected this game's microtransactions very well and called it the most offensive https://www.youtube.com/wat...
"You have to accept that your progress in online play is only valid as long as the servers are operating properly."
Yeah, that's why I'll never pay for online multiplayer focused games. I'll be frightened the whole time to think what would happen if the servers go off.
Microtransactions always ALWAYS has an unbalancing system that separated players. Those who play the game to earn content have to suffer tedium and annoyance, while those with tons of money to unwisely spend are more rewarded, but with no benefit or satisfaction, which destroys the meaning of video games in the first place.
People shouldn't be surprised by this type of system here. You let it happen in the first place. You keep paying for the micros in $60 and now look...
This is why I don't pay for games that focus on Multiplayer mostly, especially now that I have to pay $60 a yr for a subscription service to play it. I'll stick with Wolfenstein.
I just bought a PS4 recently for $300+. As a gamer, I'm not buying another one.
So you're releasing KH3 on Xbox One as well, but all of the previous story will only be on PS3 and PS4? Really?
No. Don't do it. That's just a trap for them to keep milking people for this so they can continue on with COD set in futures. Just get COD4 on PC or previous consoles. The remaster is not worth this much.
Hope to get ROTTR soon.
Pay $50 for small in-game currency. BRILLIANT.
Just got the game the moment I read this article. Heard great things about this game. Can't wait to play it on Sunday.
Well. Say good bye to having a digital port of Bayonetta 2, and Wonderful 101. Nintendo! You f***ed up again.
By doing stupid **** instead of being a GOOD business.
Well? Will I still be able to play them digitally? I want to play Bayonetta 2 again. Along with Wonderful 101, and Xenoblade Chronicles X. I'm not going to buy a WiiU again just for these games on a system they are barely supporting anymore when I JUST BOUGHT a PS4 and could in the future buy a N-Switch. I don't have all the money in the world Nintendo. I don't have enough for one.
F*** Battlefield 1, I'm getting New Order.
To make matters worse, You have to buy them even though you mind have bought the season pass.