true but the masks are gay
@gamingdroid and theres some one smarter than anonymous and sony might have just hired him. Or he might be against anonymous all together.
it cost anonymous their valuable time they could be spending watching v for vendetta. In the past it seems like they get bored quickly and just move on. And it is also costing anonymous supporters, because trying to bring down the psn isn't making them any friends. Its also drawing a lot of attention to them selves making them far less anonymous. They need to learn how to pick their battles.
ah the BILLs crappier running back haha. thats not beast mode thats lets watch the saints arm tackle like theyre playing tag. But hey lets see how they draft this year. Not a fan of Pete Carroll never was, but he should be able to evaluate college talent now.
cuz the seahawks did have any cover worthy player lol go pats
anonymous is really bad at being anonymous.they think the fact that they do ddos attacks makes people afraid. Oh no the web site was down what bad asses. Now they have guys bragging about it and trying to really piss some one off. I'm guessing trying to find info on some guys kids isn't going to go over well with too many people. I had no problem with them DEFENDING wikileaks but not they're just getting whiny and cocky.
oh no sony.com went down what will sony do
they stole that from colbert
some kids that watched v for vendetta and liken them selves to be superheros.. but probably dont leave the house.
They shouldn't get too cocky. Not that sony will be a problem but it would help to stay anonymous, not drawing too much attention to them selves because soon they are going to become a big target. However im not totally convinced its actually anonymous. It seems like someone who just saw the episode of colbert report even coping the hornets nest metaphor. But who really cares what they do. Like little kids they think they are super heros saving things but attacking companies doesnt prove ...
inside the car blurs too
seriously dont think ign= the community. One of them couldn't even follow along with the story. It was not a hard story to follow along with if your older than 8. And not one of them explained really any thing it should have done differently or that any game does better. Then you through in that they brought up crysis for no reason at all and i get this strange feeling of bias like i always have from ign.
some of these guys seem like they wanted it to be bad. Editor Samuel Claiborn couldnt even understand what happened in the story. It wasnt that hard to follow along. I have read them say one way in which another shooter beats it.
good article i agree with you. I havent finished it yet along with any other shooter ive played thats too easy with bad ai. Im glad i didnt buy it
im not sure how the new game will work, but if you think about it the archstones were basically check points there tough guy. i dont think you went through and beat all the worlds with out dieing
ya me too i was pretty shocked
i dont really think its a "massive" update. they're just changing how they use the space on the dvds
which one looks better can be argued but which one runs better, plays better, and has better levels and ai easily goes to Killzone
you realize youre talking about strides the ps3 made when it came out, right? which may not even be the case because we have no idea what he is referring to.
And in the last ps3 update i got cloud saves so ms can keep trying to catch up.
@LoVeRSaMa See it is not sony against 2 guys its them vs the law like any other case. If they were found to break the law they go to court thats what happens. So now sending a person to court because they committed a crime is bad since its only 1 guy? Why does this kid get pity just because he was stupid. If the court finds he didn't break the law then hes set, no problem. Anonymous is the only one I see attacking innocent people. They think they can make the laws and do what they want ju...