Gamechup does this a lot and it's really annoying.
The admins of Reddit aren't the most reliable bunch of people either. They're very unhelpful in the community and will ban without notice. One of the worst communities on the internet that place is.
The focus on ship combat should make it pretty refreshing in my opinion. One of my favorite features of AC3.
Haven't been this excited for E3 since they showed off Uncharted 2 back in 2009. Only a few more hours, can't wait!
This is a horrible comparison. Remember Me actually looks very good on PC at Max settings. I didn't even realize it was UE3 until I paid attention to the start up screens. Does it look next-gen? Probably not, but it's a very pretty game to say the least.
Long as I can attach a guy to the back of my plane and do loops and rolls with him still back there it's a winner in my book.
Really want to see what Black Tusk is up to as well as Avalanche. Have a feeling that Avalanche is going to make one hell of an open world game when they finally show off Just Cause 3.
No idea how you read that as sarcastic..
If they would just continue making actual entries in the series instead of these lame spinoffs or downloadable titles they keep throwing out to milk the franchise then that graph would probably be a lot more consistent. Lets just hope they eat their words and don't make a FUSE 2.
I think with the cloud it may be more than that. I doubt these will be the last consoles, but the more I hear about these cloud features so all we'll need is a little thing like the OnLive box to connect to a TV and play games.
Well, Planetside 2 is running over 2000 and is coming to the PS4...sooo...I think 64 is a given for both consoles. DICE did say they could do it on the PS3 and Xbox 360, but the graphics would have taken a hit and they didn't want that.
I would love to see some huge maps in Battlefield 4 with 256 players like MAG. One can dream right?
I was a bit worried the game wouldn't look great, but damn it's pretty. Can't wait to see gameplay.
@Wenis
Did you read the review? Reviews are not supposed to be focused on your opinion of the game. You're supposed to review the quality of the game as a professional reviewer. Opinionated stuff is for personal blogs, not a professional website like Polygon.
His arguments were outlandish. Too violent? Are you joking? The M rating is there for a reason. The game made him feel like he was a bad person. Uh, since when has another game gave you an emotion l...
Oh I know it's not smart, obviously creates a bad image for you and your business. Just ridiculous that publications find this worth reporting on to snag clicks and create controversy.
So? He's a person defending his project. Just because you run a business or are a professional at something doesn't mean you don't have emotions..
And we say Modern Warfare was milked lol! But now, this looks good. Might try it on my tablet.
Could be a timed exclusive. I doubt EA would want to lose the extra money from not releasing on the PS4.
Play the game for about 4 hours, find a bunch of gear, level up your character and gain a ton of influence points and then come back and tell me when they die that you don't care lol.
Sorry, but reviews may be opinion, but they're also based on the quality of the game itself, and for a big site like Polygon to score this game that score (Won't say it's low because 7.5 isn't), it doesn't make sense. Across big name sites like IGN, Gamespot, EDGE and so on all awarding the game near perfect scores it's obviously a quality game and this score doesn't reflect that and more someone's opinion.
Pulling the too violent card is also ...
Yea, but the way it reads is in a negative matter by emphasizing the word "cheap".