About what, you not reading the article?
Pathetic is not reading the article to realize not only was it not Microsoft who did it, but there was also a sign explicitly saying it was running on PC. So basically, a 3rd party company did it, and was totally honest about it...
:: picks up his football and goes home::
Did you even read the article?
Ok, there is no easy that VR will help Sony catch up in power. Whoever wrote that it will leverage 4k gaming is crazy...
This is good for consoles. It allows the company to establish a constant user base like PCs. They don't have to stay over each generation. This allows developers top access a greater number of consumers allowing them to take bigger chances with their games.
This is win win
Actually most PS4 owners used graphics as the reason they choose their console. So it's a valid argument then to not be interested in a PS4 game due to the graphics being poor.
That being said it doesn't look bad for a PS3 port...
Fanboy...read the article first
I'm not sure why you are holding microsoft accountable for one honest developer. This really is pushing it, even for Sony fans
Most developers use PCs especially if they aren't far along enough to use the actual code. Sony has done it, everyone does it. Moving on....
Plus, they posted a sign stating they used PC due to early code! Completely transparent and honest...
You guys say you don't care about graphics, but you knocked Xbox One for what exactly? GRAPHICS!! So weird that when the shoe is on the other foot, it doesn't matter anymore.
These comments make no sense. They say they confirmed neo to educate public and blah blah blah.... But the Scorpio reveal was nothing more than confirmation of specs just like they did. The only difference was that Microsoft had a clip to show. How can he knock MS for it...
Yup, you are wrong.Scorpio officially announced for next year with 6tflops of gpu power and an 8 core cpu. Boom!
Can't wait to play this game
Worst predictions ever. Sounds like a laundry list of "Games you want but don't want to pay for"...
It is a very good thing. Allows consoles to stay with the times, crates a cheap entry level for poor gamers who can't afford cutting edge but want to play with their friends, and allows full compatibility with all games. If each console survives just one upgrade every three years, that's a 6 year life cycle. That's perfect.
Well in Scorpios defense, it's enough of a nap forward that it constitutes having a true entry level and a true high end box. The Neo making such a tiny jump is somewhat pointless. I suspect Sony will go back to the drawing board and release a higher end box similar to Scorpio. They won't let themselves fall that far behind in power...
6 tflops! Honestly that's plenty more powerful. Plus, I've always bought launch systems, so I'll definitely be first in line for the Scorpio. Not sure about the Neo since I won't be using VR and it's a small upgrade.
I think every 3 years we should get an upgraded console from Microsoft. Makes sense, and helps customer retention.
I'm finally drifting away from this game, and I've defended it a lot...
That's easy, Xbox One successor is a Trojan horse to merge PC and consoles. If it successfully add Windows 10 games, they essentially can release incremental console upgrades that are really just USER FRIENDLY PCs used mainly for gaming on your t.v.
In all honesty, it's a brilliant move, since there is no real definition of what separates a console from a PC, they almost wouldn't need permission to port games from the PC to the console, assuming it runs Windows ...
Wasn't during the conference, it was at a booth. Please read the article.