The Vita is dead you mean. Want to find the culprit - It's Sony.
I don't think we're going to see that any time soon.
The writers heart's in the right place, but he seriously needs to do his research. If you're going to talk about Nintendo and VR you really need to look at the Virtual Boy, not the wiiu... sure iit was a commercial failure but it was also the worlds first commercial VR device made 20 years ago,.
An NX. It's the only one with anything close to a release date and a decent launch title.
Of course he would, That's why he put them in MK9 and 10 as a proof of concept to show to WB.
Power means jack all. This gen is the first where the 'most powerful' console has come out on top, and it had bugger all to do with it. The PS4 is winning because it has games people want to play on it. If the reaction to the new Zelda is anything to go by, i think a lot o people will be buying an NX simply for that, not to mention all the rumblings about them shaking up all of their major franchises. They make a machine that third parties can easily develop for and give us a steady ...
The reason to own a console is for convenience and exclusives. They keep pumping out games i like that i can't play on any other platform. I'll keep getting a playstation. I seriously think MS have shot themselves in the foot with porting all their games to PC. it just maes the xbox one pretty much pointless, you may as well just get a PC.
It totally should, then there would be no point buying a PS4 at all!
Yes they did. here's a direct quite from the press release...
"The Legend of Zelda for Wii U will be Nintendo’s focus of the show this year, and will be the only playable game in Nintendo’s booth via extended demos.
Nintendo’s kick-off to the E3 show happens at 17:00 BST on Tuesday 14th June, when Nintendo of America President and COO Reggie Fils-Aime introduces Nintendo Treehouse: Live, which will be dedicated to a day of live-streamed gameplay of ...
Look at the New 3ds, the dsi, the 32x, the ram cart for the n64, the mega cd, the kinect and every other add on and iterative step that has ever been produced in gaming. All of them failed to get any great swaythe of developer support and the lack of clear and decisive benefits for gamers just means most probably wont bother.
If not that many people buy in, then devs wont bother putting in the extra effort required to make the most of the expanded hardware, 1st party stuff...
They've already said. they're showing Zelda. and that's it.
They won't but i'd be really surprised if the likes of Game don't.
I totally agree with this review, and i've said it before. U4 is pretty, it plays fairly well. But its not perfect. The mercs magically turning up every ten minutes made no sense, and the fact you spend most of the game with Sam (AKA the most dull character in the entire series) rather than Sully and Elena just dragged it down further. And the friendly AI is bad.
I would say he was even more deserving, what with him being somewhat lesser known. But personally, I would like to see a Medievil reboot.
It wont be a separate disc. At best it will be a code in the box. Do you honestly think Activision are going to release MWR in a manner that could be easily transferable before you can 'officially' buy it separately.
Which is bound to happen, because publishers like money, and its a guaranteed money spinner for next summer.
Well it is now, or it was for a time. either way i have the original trilogy on mine.
No. Next question.
I played Crash again the other day on my vita. I'd love a new one.
Its pretty, But the story is the weakest in the series by a country mile. Sam is a pointless character and the whole thing would be better if they just ditched that annoying retconing opening at the orphange and just replaced Sam with Sully in all of the bits afterwards.
I haven't reviewed it, but if i did it would get an 8.there, i said it. It's good, but it never hits the heights of Among Thieves.
Not many or everyone over the age of 10?