victorMaje

Trainee
CRank: 5Score: 125850

How many first-party live service vs non live service games released in the past 2 years?

234d ago 7 agree1 disagreeView comment

Physikal!

241d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

I’ve been waiting for this!

241d ago 4 agree0 disagreeView comment

I was always against any skin/cosmetics that moved away from the military theme. The reason being it’s never a sudden change to get to the joke we’re in now but more of an easing process.

They’ll always try a little & then a bit more & so on until it’s so far off they just don’t care anymore & go all in & completely sacrifice immersion for the $$$ the skins are generating…

It’s like going to see a military action movie that was hyped &...

243d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

I’m worried the skins will only stay logical the first few months, then I fear they’ll go all in with the nonsensical…

243d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

👆🤞

249d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

They really nailed the indy feel. Sounds, voices, mechanics & looks! Egypt part is phenomenal in that game.
Thank you MachineGames, can’t wait for more, & more Egypt. Hopefully Hawara Labyrinth is next.

252d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

More fun for your pockets of course.

253d ago 10 agree0 disagreeView comment

True, though I’m hoping they don’t mess this up. It can have a lot of potential, fingers-crossed.

255d ago 3 agree4 disagreeView comment

I’ve been waiting for this one, hopefully it’s as good as they say.

259d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Still no 60fps patch…smh.

261d ago 2 agree3 disagreeView comment

Any gaming access subscription system is not meant to move gaming forward. It’s only meant to change the playing field and create a constant revenue stream in order to show a semblance of success on that field.

Subscribers only see the immediate "value" (price of games) saved, and they fail to see the eventual "value" (quality of games) lost.

Worst of all, a subscriber becomes an accomplice of the system because of that perceived pri...

266d ago 26 agree2 disagreeView comment

Please, was this article paid for by Xbox? They haven’t dared shit in a long time.
What’s insulting is thinking we can’t see through the shilling. Are you kidding me with that opinion or were you born yesterday?
Daring to be different…sure with Smoke & Mirrors, the MS way, undermining the whole industry & their fanbase.

I’ve said it before, I’ll say it again, & I’ll keep being proven right, you can’t & now shouldn’t trust Microsoft.

269d ago 30 agree4 disagreeView comment

I hope this reverberates worldwide!

270d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Unfortunately there’s only 1 solution. Don’t buy it. Getting my non-C.E physical copy tomorrow.

270d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Everything Xbox for the past 10 years has been insulting.
They played their fanbase like a fiddle.

270d ago 4 agree0 disagreeView comment

Ever thought of ssd cartridges?

277d ago 6 agree2 disagreeView comment

Went back to essential a few months ago. I’m buying more physical and it has helped in finishing more games.

278d ago 3 agree1 disagreeView comment

1 over 5 would be equivalent to a 2 here.
They rated it at 7 so I'd say you're wrong in arguing they're doing it to stand out, it looks a lot more like difference of opinion, which they're entitled to.

Personally, I usually trust gamer reviews more, as for publications, at this point I definitely trust Gamespot way more than IGN, in anything.

279d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

Agreed. I’ve been saying for years, announce you won’t be buying the upcoming game because of the practices of the previous game, then you only have to stick to your guns once, see how quickly things change for the better.

We have to unite in what we shouldn’t purchase.

292d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment