Looks decent.
Because the title is retarted, and some of the points in it are as well.
From the title, he's suggesting that we drop multiplayer all together. Normally I would have reported it as misleading, but I disagree with some of the points in the article.
The notion of dropping all multiplayer from every single game is, as I put in the report, F'ng lame.
Looks pretty awesome. Hope it comes all platforms.
Hope Journey is as awesome and beautiful as Flower.
2 player split screen is fine enough for me.
That would be a great idea. I could just buy the MP in a game like CoD or Bad Company 2 and ignore the crap single player. And people who hate mp can just satisfy themselves with the sp mode.
Your favorite game sucks no matter what they do... I'm just sayin'.
It's not even out yet, so how can it be overrated?
Overhyped in your OPINION, but something which is not out yet and hasn't even been reviewed cannot be overrated.
You're an idiot.
Uhh, an 85 is a great score. You must subscribe todays idiotic logic of "anything below a 9 or 90% sucks". I feel sorry for you, you're missing out on a lot of great games.
Listening =/= obeying every single demand. They've listened to and implemented a LOT of suggestions made by the community, so I think they're doing quite a good job so far. Besides, maybe, just maybe, they're talented enough to develop the game to not have so many glitches.
And who gives a crap if it looks like CoD4 or not? This may surprise you, but not EVERYBODY cares about graphics.
I wasn't SUPER excited about it. I mean, I had hoped it would pretty much be Gears of War for ps3, but I guess I'll have to continue to wait further for something like that to happen (uncharted is cool, but I want a fictional tps multiplayer game with crazy weapons that are at least kind of unique, and not the generic m4, ak, rpg, shotgun, etc.).
But it's definitely not going to ruin my day, or even 5 minutes of my life for that matter.
They may not have had exactly 12 years, but they've had well enough time to create both, you idiot.
"Also people like you that say games always need multiplayer need to die."
I didn't say every game needed multiplayer you dumb piece of sh*t, I said that Duke Nukem Forever SHOULD have multiplayer, as well as a long ass single player game, because they have definitely had enough time to craft both. Even 4 years is enough time to make both. <...
F*** that, I want both. There is NO f*cking excuse why these devs cannot bring both, so the whole "mp will ruin this game" excuse is COMPLETE F'ng bullsh**. They've had 12 years to make this game, so if this games sp ends up being mediocre and happens to have a mp mode, there is no way in hell you can blame multiplayer this time. You will only be able to blame it on the crappy/lazy developer, because they have had all the time in the world.
"And that costs money."
Which they are getting plenty of from ridiculously overpriced accessories and xbox live (and those that would continue to use xbox live if online were made free). And probably a crap load of other sources that I don't care to look up.
Sony gets to give online free to people by micro transactions (ps home sales) and by playstation plus revenue, so why can't Microsoft just offer online for free when they are getting SO...
"cod takes no skill the need of skill is masked by the sheer damage that weapons do to enemies"
So? If you don't like it, then play something that does require skill and stop b*tching. Call of Duty has never been and will never be about skill, and that's not a bad thing. I like different kinds of shooters, and sometimes I'm in the mood for a fast paced arcadey type game. Just because a game does not require skill, does not mean it's a bad game. ...
Nu uh! [insert game here] is WAAAAYYYY better than [insert game here]. Only n00bs, campers, fanboys and idiots play [insert game here].
Your opinion is worthless and I hate you and I hope really bad things happen to you because you do not share my opinion on [insert game here]. Plus, you MUST be an inferior idiot to even own a [insert gaming system here], so your opinion doesn't matter anyway!
World at War was a good game. Much better than Modern Warfail 2.
One can only hope.
There's this new fangled idea called "self control". The idea is that if you aren't an idiot, you can actually control your self, hence the name "self control". Crazy, I know, but trust me, it works.