Silly logic man, N4G commentors don't buy games to have fun with them, they buy them so they can tell everybody how stupid and inferior everyone else is to them for not sharing the exact same tastes as they do.
The only fun that the majority of the commentors get is posting insulting comments online.
3 months? That's a pretty damn long time to me for ONE game. I get bored with the majority of games in about one month (or however long it takes me to beat the game).
Dear HipHopGamer,
Thank you for not lying/misleading in your title, I know it must have been hard for you to do. Keep it up (not lying or misleading) and I shall actually visit your site.
4)Save your damn money
Bout f*ckin time.
I plan on getting it from my friend, so no worries for me.
Hell nay!
It damn well better have some extra content since we've had to wait for it for so long.
If they took all that time making it and had nothing extra to show for it, people would be pretty pissed.
"hopefully all the hackers go play Black Ops so us normal gamers can enjoy this..."
That kind of implies you aren't getting Black Ops, distancing yourself from it by saying 'us' normal gamers. It's a very easy phrase to misconstrue.
I'll be playing both, getting twice the enjoyment you are.
They're better than Grand Theft Auto 4.
I didn't disagree with you, I'm just telling you why someone probably would (assuming they aren't just pissed off no-life a-holes that disagree and bubble down everything and everybody).
Obviously someone disagrees with you that AA was an amazing super hero game.
I still fail to understand why people continue to care whether or not somebody has clicked the disagree button on their comment.
Whenever somebody says something like "I'm going to rent this game" and wonder why they get a disagree, it's because the readers take the comment that they just read, and apply it to themselves, kind of like an actual conversation. They ...
Wait, the writer of Sunshine is doing this? That was a fantastic movie. Sign me up.
Saint's Row 1 and 2 say hi (both better than GTAIV).
Gears controls weren't sluggish, just a bit weighty.
Seriously. It better be at TGS.
"Now MP has become the cash-cow for publishers to get as many miles from their games as possible, but at the expense of the SP aspect."
I agree, but in my opinion, both multiplayer and single player are both equally important. I know others may not share that view, but I'd like to not be attacked for having that opinion. Whenever a game is announced that sounds interesting to me, if they announce it's single player only, or multiplayer only, or has both, ...
I disagree with that point in that it's too much to ask for/hope. I reported mainly for the title, which I should have changed to misleading, however; the title itself is lame also, so I felt the report deserved the lame title rather than the misleading title.
I don't mind that some people don't like multiplayer, I understand it's not THEIR particular thing. But I've been seeing a lot of hatred on this site towards anything that has multiplayer, and even...
Seriously. These kinds of sites should be boycotted from n4g unless it's the only place to find an exclusive piece of information/video. That crappy screenshot viewer sucks as well. Clicking on the image, like normal other sites, would result in an enlarging of the image, however on THESE kinds of sites, it only goes to the next image. That's what the damn arrows on the sides of the images are for (changing to the next image). Who the hell needs an extra way to go to the next ima...