There isn't gonna be much differnce they will add tweaks here and there and try add improvements but I think they optimized it as much as they could for Gears 2. You notice on the first shot though on the article they picked the worst possible shot they possibly could find? The rest of the gears 3 shots are all from a vid that's not even in game? What point are tey trying to make with those shots?
Exactly its a walled garden they control and always will control.
If they wasn't there wouldn't be a huge market for pre-owned games... You don't see pre-owned DVD markets or pre-owned movie markets do you??
MS usually pay for all marketing on 360 "exclusives" but unlike with most so called "exclusives" MS didn't actually pay for this one so they don't really care if it sells well thus the lack of advertising.
I called this! I said it wasn't gonna sell well long before it was release. You could check back through my comments if old site was still alive. It's the genre that killed it simple as. I said it then and there. Look at alone in the dark numbers.. That was an established IP and could barely shift 1 million in numbers.. Can we finally admit either this is a dying genre or on the 360 unless its an FPS only the biggest name games will shift BIG numbers. I think its the latter personally...
Like every 360 game nearly comes with updates on the disc and every PSP game nearly too. This is nothing new really. But if a game needs an update itts always best to include it for those few who still don't have net (they do exist!)
Full transformation costumes rather than just clothes?? That is a massive plus in my book.
So soon your xbox live gold will get you what exactly?? As it wont pay for online play that's for sure.. This is a blow to MS more than anybody else as they charge for online play now with individual companys charging on top MS will find it even harder to justify that fee.. 3 fees for online broadband - live - game. Not to mention PS3 has the most exclusives meaning less games you will have to pay this extra £10 fee..
This is what you get if you switch what used to be a PS exclusive brand to another console. Ubisoft sure paid the price here the question is did MS make up for the money lost? I seriously doubt it.
Seems Halo Reach has got a fight on its hands if this gets a 2010 release date.. Looking at those shots this has been in development since they finished 2 and that's longer than reach so I wouldn't put a 2010 release past them.
the point is does anybody care about Sonic 4 anymore?? It was fantastic when announced but people are bored of waiting for a game which in reality should have took them a month or so to make in this day and age..
can't argue getting a £4 game for £1 and getting freeplay free! lol
They are terrible reviewers SS is a TERRIBLE game I played the demo its a burnout wannabe that doesn't even try hard enough.
I agree you know they SLATED white knight for its same old story we seen it before blah blah (check out the review for proof) yet Marios story is ALWAYS the same yet they give it 10/10! I feel like Mugatu in Zoolander looking at all of Zoolanders moves they are all the same but everybody sees different! The review just proves how biased they are.
@Raiinstorm81 thanks but I have nothing against the gameplay It may deserve a 10 I dunno I have to play myself but the graphics issue is what gets me sure it might beat other wii titles but we should be comparing it to other games this gen and hell it doesn't even touch some of the worst looking 360/PS3 games. Mario is fun and that's what games are about not graphics I have always said this but the problem with reviews is they review graphics.. They then change the reviews to suit the...
Split Second is TERRIBLE Point made..
Probably to do with that cloud network from another article on here.
If reviewers reviewed all PS3 and 360 games with the same open mind they do on SMG2 they would give a lot of 10's out to be fair.. They are really harsh with most games yet it seems if you stick Halo/Mario/GTA on the box the reviewers instantly give it a completely different type of review than every other game.. I mean honestly graphics 10?? What do they compare it to?? They didn't even give Uncharted graphics a 10 talk about biased... You can't give a cartoon game graphics 10/10...
*Yawn* Yeah and it will still play and look pretty much like last years just like every other NHL and just like FIFA Madden ETC people only buy for team upgrades if we are being serious EA rip consumers off and make life harder on themselves by making a new game every year just make roster updates its cheaper for EA and cheaper for the gamer.
It was a 360 exclusive until the FFXIII sold a hell of a lot better on PS3 then they realised where there real audience lay and yet again with this game it was proven that PS3 owners prefer SE over 360 owners. This is 2 games now by S-E released on both consoles that has sold better on PS3 over 360 in Europe and USA. (sold More than double on PS3 worldwide!). So making FFXIII versus multi-platform would be a stupid move.
I think you can also kiss goodbye to future S-E 360 ex...