naw... it really DOES NOT need it, but it's still a GREAT thing as more time will only make it better and wont hurt. Now lets see if Activision will start doing ACTUAL EARLY betas for CoD, so that community requested changes can be made..
Naw dude... there really is not any netcode issues at all.. it STILL @ 30hz tickrate (CoD is only 10hz by the way).. this particular site is NOTORIOUS for publishing false hate DICE/EA articles for the sake of views..
wow... if you think this is EXACTLY like BF4, you need to have you head examined.. please chill with the EA hating, CoD fanboy verbage... its getting old...
the level of no thought dumbness in these responses are already nauseating. You people have NO IDEA what the full game will have. But i guess its cool for nerds to hate just for the sake of hating.. oh well..
the full game IS NOT even out yet.... how the hell do you know what the full game will have?? How do you know how many maps, how many modes, the actual game will have?? YOU DONT.. just parroting what your favorite CoD youtuber is sayin huh??
Fact is, the beta was FUN AS HELL... Hardline looks similiar to Bf4, just as CoDs look similiar to previous CoDs, but nobody says SH%# about all of the CoDs looking similiar and being on the same engine because its suppposedly "fun...
spoken like a true CoD fanboy... the beta was FUN AS HELLL actually.. it just looked similiar to BF4 as it used the same engine... Funny how clown CoD fanboys dont say SH%# about CoD's similiarities to the previous one just one year earlier because it supposedly "fun", but Hardline looks similiar to BF4 and CoD fanboys come from under rocks to say "it looks too similiar to BF4"... the question is WAS IT FUN? and that will be answered with a loud HELL YEAH.... can&#...
EXACTLY!!!!!!! and they also accept the excuse of "it may look similiar to the previous CoD, but its all about fun right?"
CoD does this same crap every year but it's cool, because it's about "having fun" and "not about graphics" and "the CoD formula".. Hardline makes a game that's about "having fun" and the lame CoD fanboys on n4g have something stupid to say..
So freakin tired on these no-thought so called impression articles, by people that don't care to say about CoD being the same crap, same engine, but run out to buy it with no problem.. The point is, you DO NOT know what the full game will offer so you can't legitimately talk about it being "an expansion".. Was Ghosts an expansion?.. Because it sure as hell look like MW3.. Was MW3 an expansion? Because it sure as hell looked like MW2.. But nobody said crap about these becau...
yeah, just how dogs are called to fall out the sky and attack people during a military battle....GTFO... this game is fun as hell so far..
SOOOO incredibly funny the level of trash that makes it's way onto N4G.com these days.. How is the author EVEN REMOTELY mentioning this game failing without the slightest notion of what the actual game will encompass. This stupid A@# article is SOLELY based on the fact that this looks similiar to BF4 (it uses the same engine, it supposed to look similiar)...
What's really going on is the fact that as it was "cool to hate on EA/DICE and anything BF4", now...
unbelievable that people are ACTUALLY trying to paint Hardline as a damn DLC when YOU HAVENT EVEN SEEN THE WHOLE GAME.. you haven't seen the modes, you haven't seen the new maps, you haven't seen all of the features the game will have. All you people have seen is the fact that this is built on the same engine as BF4, thus is looks similiar (just like EVERY CoD since MW3, but nobody talks about not buying those, huh)? Point is, Visceral has hit the target of fun from the beta, a...
because the troll that submitted this twice it trying their HARDEST to get folks to talk negative about Hardline just because it looks similiar to BF4, when it reality, its actually a load of fun to play..
Ok.... so now it looks like the whole "its cool to hate on BF4 and EA" thing has moved over to Hardline.. wow, gamer nerds are so stupid and shallow sometimes.. Did you people have the same whiny attitude towards CoD and how similiarly every one of them looked to the previous ones while using the same engine?? Hell, no.. WHY?? Because, supposedly, the CoD formula is about fun.. No one cares about graphics or the fact that Ghosts aint much different to MW3... Its the "CoD form...
cant wait for this on the XBOX 1... its fun as hell on the PC at the moment.. lovin it.. wayy more fun than BF4's beta..
naw dude... you're not in the minority.. its just that the video game industry is FULLL of CoD fanboys and BF4 haters, that this is the new "doesn't require thought" thing to hate on from EA... most people haven't even play the beta.. just going by what they're favorite CoD YTer has to say about it... ITS FUN AS HELL!!!!! but folks are so caught up on the fact that it looks similiar to BF4, that they don't stop to think that 1. it was only 1 map/2 modes 2. it was...
the same reason you have DOGS fallin out the sky to chase people in CoD... IT AINT MEANT TO BE A SIMULATION, ITS MEANT TO BE FUN...
Soooo many CoD fanboys on the site it aint even funny... No, this doesn't feel like a DLC, NO is doesn't feel like an expansion, YES, it's hella fun to play.. if this is a DLC, then every CoD game since MW3 sure as HELL has been a DLC (same old crappy engine, few changes).. but none of you CoD fanboys had anything to said about those game being DLC huh?? GTFO CoD fanboys..
absolute BLAST playing this beta... and by NO MEANS is this any kind of DLC just because it's using the same FB3 engine (if this is a DLC, every CoD game has been a DLC since MW3 since that all have looked similiar and used the same engine).... having a ton of fun playing this and can't wait for more info and more footage..
it not a small number... its a HUGE number that think its stale and dull, its just that its fanboy sites like IGN to hype it to hell and back and make people think "OMG I HAVE TO GET THE NEXT CoD!" only to bitch and complain about it 3 months later..