No P2W games just suck, it just wouldn't look good if Sony endorsed a bunch of them, plain and simple. Business wise it's all the wiser, clearly it's a money maker, it's the quality of said games that's the problem. Paying to win is exactly my problem. F2P games can be done correctly, ala League of Legends. Or they can go the pay to win route, ala most others modern F2P games.
Likes a driving game, likes that genre specifically, must be a fanboy. Oh the logic of trolls on the internet. So he has a preference in driving titles, wah cry some more dude. It's a driving game, it's not like we all play them, chances are most of don't. Hell the last one I actually enjoyed was Jak X. Your name says it all. Sounds like you're the latest attachment to Sony's hind quarters. So I have to ask can you remove your lips, or are they super glued on?
DRM, Wonder Book, a lack of PS4 chassis, too many F2P/P2W games, and focus on motion controls. And chances are Sony will avoid these like the black plague. Gonna be a good E3 for everyone. Can't wait for Monday.
Halo- 3, and Reach, 4 was a joke, it's population proves it
Skyrim- Self explanatory, not exclusive.
Battlefield- Self explanatory, not exclusive, also Sony had the timed deal with them, so that's an up for Sony.
Dark Souls- Great game, still not exclusive, bigger install base on PS3.
Castle Crashers- Fantastic arcade game, one of my favorites, and of course the shocking part to you, not exclusive.
Al...
The first few years after it's launch. (horrid failure rates aside) Don't troll just to troll, doesn't look good. It's had good games and it's people like you that like to pretend it's never had any at all. Yeah they messed up with the quantity, and the quality of recent titles, but pretending it didn't have a strong streak of games (first 3 years of it's life) is outright ignorant.
New IP's from Microsoft, all of the retail titles from Sony, and Smash Bros from Nintendo. And for the love of god Fallout 4, and Prey 2 Bethesda, I can only wait so long. Prey 2 especially, announced 500 years ago, hasn't been talked about since.
The flame bait isn't the video, it's this comment section in T-minus as soon as GreenPowerz or StrongMan gets here.
Thanks for submitting the flame bait Mezzo, it's exactly what we wanted, more trolling.
I'll repeat myself. I don't care how good the game is, if you can't make one nitpick, you're way to biased to make reviews. No game is perfect. It looks great, I can't wait to play it, but a little objectivity couldn't hurt. I mean PlayStation magazine? A perfect 10? This game could very well be one of the best console games of this generation but the brand that owns the magazine cripples objectivity. They wouldn't ever play down a product, especially their flagshi...
The worst in the trilogy got a 9.5? What the hell.
I listened to the review, he made perfectly valid criticisms of the game. An 8 or 8.5 would have fit the criticisms he made much better, but I'm happy somebody has the balls to make criticisms these days. I don't care how good the game is, if you can't make one nitpick, you're way to biased to make reviews. No game is perfect.
I don't really care what the article is about this is the exact same one from a few days ago. How do this crap get passed? Repeat articles are nothing but an annoyance, and made to generate flame bait.
I'll be saying the same thing about Destiny and Bungie when it's released.
Finally some games! Keep some surprises, adds to the effect. At least you're getting this conference right Microsoft, now we just need some questions answered and we're good to go.
Out of all the fanboy crap being spewed after the Xbox One reveal I'm so happy somebody got to making genuinely funny videos. This was priceless, also considering getting a Wii.
The bad consumers made GameStop. That second hand game market is bringing the onslaught of DRM. Back in 2002 it wasn't a big deal when you loaned a copy of Jak to a friend, the used games market simply wasn't there to put a sharp drop off in sales. Regardless of who created it, GameStop is still the problem, and the people who shop there only support this crap. Loaning games for a few days isn't a problem, the games being resold is.
I'm more than miffed they can't get the answers we want out of the way, better answer them during the presser Microsoft. It shouldn't take 2 weeks of internal circle jerking to figure out that consumers don't want DRM, and they want to play used games. Two simple questions, just answer them. Used games is a little iffy just because it's the cause of DRM, but I think we could find a better solution. Developers making trade-ins impossible for starters, that way you can still...
It was run on a very similar in specs PC, they didn't have a chassis at that point so they didn't have the hardware shaped to fit into it. So a PC would have to suffice. Granted it was a little annoying, but the PC wasn't high end, it was very close on specs.
Well to the people mindlessly hating. Why would this not be coming out this summer if it was already done working at the speeds it was in the event? They have quite a few months left to work on things, i'd imagine the speed of the UI is one of them. The UI is one of the great things about the 360, I don't they let the laggy version go at launch. Hate for the sake of hate, it's outright pathetic.
A game 10 years in the making, a game so good it took us 7 of those years just for us to pick the name. Sarcasm. This goes one of two ways. Every Forza game has been a crappy beta that's all been leading up to Forza 5, or 7-8 years of deciding if a number or a word after the title actually counts as adding on to the most likely 2-3 year development time it's actually had.