Sorry, but the Switch is closer to the 360/ps3 than it is to the x1/ps4. Switch is roughly twice as powerful as the xbox 360 and ps3 and 3 times weaker than the x1 and 4.5 times weaker than the ps4..
They're also struggling to get full performance because the Switch is weak as hell and can only run simple flat-shaded Mario games well.
368p. Repeat after me, it drops to 368p. On a 6.2 inch screen !!!
Two explanations:
1: Quick WiiU port.
2: Game is cpu limited, which has same performance in portable and docked.
According to Digital Foundry, the game drops as low as 368p in handheld mode. Crazy..
I hope this trash never comes to the US..
Sounds like it's not a card for gaming, genius..
These cards are made for industrial applications, dumbass. Not gaming.
What's a vita?
Women with worse content but better boobs get more views from the limited pool of people..
Due to low-level optimization, the x1x is closer to 1070 performance than 1060.
And in reality, too, according to the steam survey.
Actually yes, yes it is. The majority of gaming pc's out there are below the 6 teraflop level of the x1x. Steam surveys don't lie.
My own pc is 3.5 teraflops. Equal to a gtx 970.
Wtf are you asking??
"Yeah no because PC is a always evolving platform with new tech replacing old within a year."
God, I hope soon enough I won't see your nonsense posts on here. What does the ever-evolving pc tech have to do with the fact that CURRENTLY the xbox one x is better than MOST pc's?? This article isn't about next month or next year. It's about TODAY.
What about the camera?
How is it a steal?? It's only $50 less than I paid for it a year ago..
Wrong, buddy. Switch is 0.4 teraflop. 3 times less than the original xbox one. Otherwise Doom wouldn't have to run at half the resolution and half the framerate on it versus the xbox one.. That's 4 times less pixels per second, and at lower settings!
It would be the same version, as the Switch can't handle HD.