That just hyped me big time, the video I saw was much shorter, really looking forward to this now.
"Wasn't the whole point of Natal to be "Controller free entertainment" or did I just imagine that being said over and over at last year's E3?
Plus, is it really worth taking 15% of the CPU for a small additional game mode that is pretty much tacked on?"
This is not the case anymore since the chip has been put back in.
who knows? I suppose all that matters is that once you have the final product it looks amazing and defies the laws of physics lol.
I agree with you on that one, although I do prefer Xbox-live on a whole I must admit my experience with PSN was a positive one, and I would indeed be more inclined to make online purchases if I did not already have Xbox-live to pay for, it's worth it don't get me wrong but with regards to these price comparisons you would have to buy all the products listed and many more before you make that saving after paying for Xbox-live, the true comparison will start once Sony brings in the premium serv...
in such a way that it auto detects the consoles with the most Hard Disk space, Xbox-360 already has 120gb HDD and 250GB on the way, IMO there is no reason why this could not make a difference to the game itself, yes this may require more disks possibly full of compressed files extracted once loaded to the HDD but why not? also if you look at the principle of Onlive and the fact that ISP's are increasing bandwidth all the time and if you have a good internet connection and the game detects it ...
please give it a reset, you are the ones starting the argument, you are the ones calling out, why say anything until you are given a reason? BTW the mods appear to be getting fed up of this.
One of mine was deleted but I don't mind, I took the bait by one of the posters, I will not say who because I am happy that the mods are putting their foot down, it's getting out of hand. Good job mods.
Good for you bubbles up. I too intend to buy a PS3 for the exclusives, I used to be a hater when it 1st came out mainly due to the price, rotten eggs much, but yeh the PS3 has turned into a real beast, it bodes well for the future because Sony are slow starters but they have proven they deliver long term.
it was obvious some would like the changes and some would not.
I can't take you seriously, you said it looks like a PS2 game in another thread so you are clearly a bitter troll.
I totally agree with you BTW, this BS has to stop, the PS3 and the 360 are clearly very close in ability.
So you did not read doggystyle comments then?
I am still a happy Xbox-360 owner, plenty left in the tank.
Why all the KZ2 comparisons, we get it some of you adore KZ2, well sorry to disappoint but I prefer Gears Of War, I know some of you would love to control my mind and change this but you can't so get over it.
I have embedded a video for those having problems:
To me it looks a great game but whenever you trying somthing new not everyone will like it, I played a bit of the demo and will give it a rent (money is tight I cannot buy them all) to see mainly what the multiplayer offers, I have not read the entire review but from what I can gather it's objective which is all you can ask for, this score to me sounds like someone who was not quite sure what they make of the new formula, without playing too much of the demo I was not 100% on the mission obje...
I played Crysis and got bored really quick, I find this very unprofessional, yes after Halo 1 the story did loose a lot of it's a appeal but you always felt connected to the charactor, I just did not feel that with Crysis, lets hope this guy lives up to his words.
I just remember it looked pretty good, I guess it's the same as when people 1st played KZ2, it looked good but not as good as the tec demo, guess I am not a graphics hore because I never noticed the difference when it was released.
Have you played the game? because I have, how about you show the actual article because as far as I am concerned unless I have selective memory this matches the game I have played.
.