@nick Yeah! Let's repeat the same things over and over again and simply grow adjusted to them instead of actually voicing our complaints and calling out bias from major corporations/ anything you can think of!
Seriously, this logic of "it has been done before, so it's ok" is trash. Holocaust has been done before, so it's ok to do it again, apparently (on an outrageous twist of your logic, ofc). Just drop it.
This game doesn't seem as scary as I thought it'd be, TBH. But it still seems to be pretty damn good, specially in the design department. There's a lot of creative and disturbing things that I saw in the demos.
Am I the only one, or have I seen a Lisa Garland reference in the screenshots?
Looking great!
To be completely honest, Silent Hill is the name of the town. Silent Hill is surrounded by.... Hills... And a lake. So maybe the name is a reference to something other than the town. Or maybe there ARE several "dimensions", which would explain the looping in the demo.
IDK. Just throwing some food for though.
Yet, Tomb Raider II was available on PC as early as 1997. So much for exclusivity, huh?
If the teaser is published by Sony, then you can pretty much expect some sort of partnership, no? Not saying it'll be an exclusive, though.
From their ealier game and from the promo material featuring the live actors, which were kind of suspenseful and mysterious on itself. Aside from that, I do not follow this game, hence why "hoped".
Looks good, but it went on a COMPLETELY different direction from what I hoped it'd turn... I was expecting something more on the lines of Alan Wake, TBH.
This game is looking beautiful and rather promising. It seems to play with the slasher genre by the book, which I find highly entertaining in movies (not all of them, though) and actually enjoyed a lot in games (Clock Tower on PlayStation and Haunting Ground on PlayStation 2 comes to mind). I really hope it lives up to the hype!
Until Dawn and Silent Hill. Sony is really investing into Survival Horror. Good to know.
I actually liked the animations a lot. The facial expressions are what turned me off a little (including lip sync). In any case, the game itslef looks particularly beautiful and tense.
Truly a shot on Lara's own feet. Sure, TR is cool and all that, but honestly, it's not all that amazing to secure a boost on sales ANYWHERE. Maybe Europe... And even there, just a little bit.
I'd totally buy if it were available and it proved to be something special. But in all honesty (and this saddens me a little, since I play Tr since 1996) It'll not be missed by me, as a PlayStation owner.
I sincerely hope for this. I'd be okay with Move Functions, though, just don't make it obligatory.
You mean, just as it would make an infertile couple/ person or people who prioritize survivability over breeding, expendable?
Isn't homossexuality as old as the human race, though?
*Minor Spoilers?*
I'm pretty sure Ellie is gay or at least bissexual. The same scene with two boys would be pretty clear that both had homossexual/ bissexual tendencies. Why people dismiss the same situation, but with girls, as them being simply "playful/ joyful" is beyond me and, IMO, a terrible double standard. Denial, perhaps?
I'd be ok with new main characters and cameos of the older ones. I'm way too attached to Joel and Ellie to see them milked beyond their purppose, which they achieved pretty successfully.
Pretty sure Thor has already been a girl in the comics. Jane Foster wielded the Hammer once, if I'm not mistaken.
This is nothinh new.
Capcom
I have nothing against famous actors playing parts in video-games. Heck, one of the coolest things that happened to Call of Duty was Sarah Michelle Gellar, Robert Englund, Danny Trejo... The thing is... That was a humorous portray of their own famous characters.
High profile actors can be very distracting in games, since you you've got to, somehow, relate to the character... To be in his shoes. If you get a famous face, sometimes you can only relate the character to the a...