wait, wasn't the Wii U version the definitive one? I mean at E3 2011, they demoed the game on a Wii U. like it was actually running on a Wii U.
I really don't understand here :/
maybe I didn't understand well or maybe it's made news already but there's quite a big spoiler in the article about Elizabeth, like really big.
I'm not buying the game anytime soon so thank god but just a warning.
that's not true.
Wii U is a significant increase over Wii. iPhone 4s has incremental changes over iPhone 4.
yeah me too. I didn't care for PS3 until I saw Versus XIII so I told myself I'd get the console as soon as the game came out LOL
yeah that's part of my point.
Vita was doing 80,000 a week past two weeks, 60,000 came from Japan, and so it was never going to maintain those numbers. it could sell like that again on a consistent basis if the price was cut all over the world so all territories contribute to the 60,000 - 80,000 units per week total
I'd imagine that realistically, those are the kind of numbers Vita could sell at.
that's great! well done! wowzers those fortune tellers on the side of the road better watch out, your skills surpass theirs by a country mile!
Vita could do 60,000 a week if they drop the price everywhere. all territories could share out that 60,000
exactly. switching between Black Ops and Battlefield 3 is night and day.
720p60fps > 1080p30fps
now CoD peeps can't say that they don't play Battlefield because of the low fps count.
60fps is such a massive improvement, thanks DICE
this "everything must be on Vita" campaign going on here on n4g is so annoying.
it's a great system no doubt but why must EVERYTHING on PS3 be on Vita? Vita needs exclusives built from the ground up with Vita in mind, not ports.
wouldn't be surprised if this was the case. Levine said that the cover of Infinite is the way it is to appeal to the casuals, dudebros mostly. as we all know these people don't visit gaming sites but when they do for a review or what, it's IGN.
2K & Irrational just doing what they need to do to sell copies I guess.
marked you for trolling. no reason to derail the comments that way.
yet all these publications gave Modern Warfarer 3 9.0s (think it's sitting on a 89 on Metacritic) when it was EXACTLY the same game we were given two years back! nothing warranted a new disc, could all be thrown in on a >2GB file as DLC.
Modern Warfare 3 reviews left a very sour taste in my mouth.
hey you have two bubbles now! congrats!
the motion blur on Agni's Philosophy was nice.
in fact I think all the effects worked best on the Agni's Philosophy snippets
holy crap that's true. in fact many of the lights were overdone
in the beginning (before patches) the flashlights were so bad you physically had to cover your eyes when playing, it was unreal.
@kwyjibo
it's 2013, it's not difficult to make an iPhone beating smartphone anymore, an "improvement" as you say. everyone caught up, even Nokia & Sony who were nowhere two years ago. it doesn't change the fact that Apple took an idea that was lousy and cumbersome, revolutionised it and with that revolutionised the mobile phone and how it is intergrated into our daily lives. Samsung took Apple's product (not idea) added a faster CPU, a better cam...
a full unveil of a game in March 2013 then release it in October 2014?
as much as I would like DICE to polish the game, highly, highly doubt that EA accept that kind of protocol. Battlefield 3 was unveiled February 2011, released October 2011. and the Battlefield 4 beta is due this year.
I don't know but nearly two years between unveil and release is very "not EA"
whatever happens I just hope we get an epic gameplay trailer lik...
Apple takes ideas and make them infinitely better, like the MP3 player and the touch screen phone.
Samsung takes ideas, put Samsung logos on top and market the living shit out of them.
people give Apple lots of shit when Samsung is the most innovationless company to ever cross the $100 billion market cap.
they're forcing this game out to ride on the GTA V hype lol lol lol
no