How does a game coming out on PC make any difference in the debate between xbox and ps4?
I bet the last guardian ends up being a tepid platformer
People seem to be willingly blind. I hope this is a great game and I'm sure it'll look great on all platforms.
Putting out PC graphic with XB1 controls showing is blatantly to try to make XB1 gamers think that that is how the finished article will look. The idea that because you could get controllers to work on PC means they are not is ridiculous, of course they are, they are marketing and trying to show their product in a light that will leave gamers wanting more. It...
I honestly don't think I'm going to bother. Fifa 15 is a good game, I don't want to have to buy another iteration AGAIN.
It's because, for all the bluster and moaning about pixels between Xbox and PS gamers, console players are basically normal people who might have friends round.
PC users on the other hand.....
Some people have more money than sense.
Why would you buy a game at full rrp to play later if you have a backlog already?
That's just stupid.
Exactly what I was about to write!
There are valid points to be discussed sensibly about the role of women in video games. Unfortunate most gamers are kids or kidlike and you get puerile nonsense such as most of this thread instead.
Aaa games in general are obsessed with huge maps and pointless side quests. Many games are far too big these days.
Everything looked okay if I ignore the random speech that doesn't fit but then out of nowhere fight music plays despite the fight being in real time. That looked crap.
Think it looks crap but I'm clearly in the minority!
Why are indie games going for £15-20 these days?
I predict less than 10% adoption across the TV market and it will be dead by within 3 years.
No, some within the TV industry have already admitted it isn't going to happen. Poeple moved to HD because it was clearly superior. There is no clear advantage with 4k for ordinary users as you'd have to huge a ridiculous TV to notice and even if you did you'd then be sat so far away it would negate the effect. It won't sell.
Oh that's fine then. So if somebody pays £60 for a gare its only right they shouldn't be able to have different looks etc without spending another £40. Of course.
Idiot.
Nobody is interested in 4k. A few sad PC Gamers who talk techie gibberish might own 4k screens but the mainstream TV owner isn't convinced and they won't take off in the same way 3d screens didn't. Most people find HD to be clear and true enough for any normal purpose.
Utter rubbish. It has nothing to do with used games, jesus you're easily led. Our is profiteering. Plain and simple. If it was about second hand sales they would reduce the price of digital to kill off discs. They just want idiots to keep spending money.
The model being employed in the sale of this game and extras is an an absolute disgrace and it is beyond belief that anybody can argue that items that are on the disc at launch should be inaccessible without paying the full price a second time. Anybody arguing that this isn't dreadful and/or refusing to buy the game on principal is part of the problem. If people didn't buy dlc it wouldnt exist. Yet we still had different skins in games before dlc came along.
Personally think this and elder online is what they'll be selling at e3. I don't expect to see fallout at all.