This game is going to fail, I just know it.
Define "incident".
I'm not bashing Homefront, but GamePro isn't exactly the most reliable source for reviews since they gave Ninja Blade a 5/5.
I've got no problem with the new character. Maybe I'm just racist, but I found the original game's protagonist to be annoying.
I watched an interview in which one of the developers said that the invading country didn't matter, and that it was more of "this could happen" situation, although not necessarily with Korea.
Remember when games' stories were along the lines of "you're over here, but you need to be over here" and no one complained? People used to enjoy games because they were fun. Now it's all about storyline and production values. That's necessary in some games, but it's not necessary to go nitpicking about how a game's plot is "impossible". It's a game, it is what it is.
Dumbest rumor I've ever heard.
I played it on the PS3, so no.
Why would you pay to cover the back of some hacker? Whether hacking is a big deal or not, these guys are doing it knowing that it's illegal and that there could be consequences. He knew what he was getting into.
I was going to mention Mass Effect, but that's more of a shooter than an RPG.
It's all about opinions. Although I, and a lot of other people, think that there are tons of great current generation RPG's. They don't all have to be fifteen years old.
Why was this primarily old/handheld RPG's? I'm not disagreeing with Pokemon, but why did you leave out games like Dragon Age, Fallout 3, or even Demon's Souls?
I'm addicted to Pokemon White right now. There are some pretty dumb Pokemon designs, but there are also some really cool ones. I really like Emboar and Krookodile, and Gollet is pretty cool too.
The only game on this list that PS3 fans might not like to be announced is Halo 4. For all the rest, who cares?
<3
Snipers are the dysentery of online shooters.
I've beaten the first game at least ten times. I love that game so much.
It looks cool, but of course the publisher would say that. It's not like that means much.
That's a good marketing technique right there.
That's way too simple and not nearly stupid enough for this game.
I don't mean that as an insult to the game, by the way.
There's a difference between taking a game from the 1940's to 2010 and taking a game from the 1800's to 2010. It's just too large of a leap.