Damn this like the 3rd or 4th time I've seen this brought up, gotten quite stale by now. You were fired, replaced, whatever, time to get over it and move on.
Don't know who he thinks he is that such common practices shouldn't happen to him while it's a regular occurrence for everyone else. They aren't obliged to do it "nicely".
Deal with it and stop acting like a spoiled manchild or worse a scorned lover.
So basically you're NOT a fan and want a totally new game, just with the same name and general theme? Plenty of other series that may fit your needs instead of turning GoW into some deep story/character driven game instead of the balls to the walls action game it is known for.
Gaming, as always, will continue on.
Yes, best one in the series! Sorry dudebros
You aren't looking at the big picture. As noted, blackface is extremely offensive to quite a large number of individuals who may not look like you.
They might be a minority in your area but the internet is worldwide. I guarantee you some parents there would have recorded the event and post it online as a proud moment for their kid, without any malicious intent towards those it would offend, and make no mistake it would offend, regardless of country of origin.
I swear this society is ready to implode on itself. The complainant is totally ok with his young daughter playing or watching him shoot and kill countless others, but completely offended at a pose that is optional and not even sexy in my opinion.
Would he have a problem if it was a male? Totally ok for a beefed up dude to walk around shirtless in a game, but the sky is falling if a female character shows even the slightest bit of skin.
Unbelievable.
This was my main complaint about the game, the terrible driving. Couldn't care less about the wind not blowing thru his hair or the shiny textures.
Or, or, hear me out, there are those of us that have played sequels to games that have vastly improved upon so many flaws of the original that completely writing off a game before we've even given a look seems asinine.
Can't believe how folks are defending sony on this. The games were clearly better when it was an optional service. My post history shows I'm no fan of MS, so no fanboyism here when I say you sony apologist aren't doing sony any favors by constantly giving them a pass.
How does my post get marked as off topic? Because it paints MS in a bad light?
Fine, I'll revise it while still saying the exact same thing. I'd say most gamers are truly interested in what sony announces at e3, though with pacter it's obvious he doesn't have anything good to say unless it involves MS "gaming" console, an abomination in my opinion.
How's that for on topic? My post clearly revolves around what pachter stated. The...
Just make a new game set in the uk so we can move on from this regurgitated subject. Wasn't interested in gta London back in the day and won't be interested in a new one nor bully for that matter. Outside of the uk folks who keep asking for this I reckon only a few are interested in this setting.
But like someone else stated, I might be interested if it's just not London. I'm sick of London like I'm sick of games being set in overused new York.
The graphics never bothered me or the "downgrade" so many pixel pixies moaned about. Nope, it was the forgettable lead character, the lack of real customization of the character and the terrible driving.
I mean you feel no difference when driving in the streets and you go over a curb. Nothing. No real sense that you indeed are driving period. And zero car customization. Made for a really boring game.
You know everyone is entitled to their opinion, however not everyone's opinion should be heard.
Better to remain silent and thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
Silly and salty this author is.
RnC most certainly wouldn't be billed as a "mature" game for adults. Calm down people, it's totally ok for adults to enjoy such titles, still doesn't change it looks likes a kids game to most.
As I'm sure someone else already stated, now that it's required for online play sony can now stop pretending about actually caring. Turns out they are just as greedy as MS.
Shame. Didn't really see this coming, but I'm hoping MS somehow finds their footing to keep sony in check. Seems like the only time any of these companies put actual value with something is when they are behind the 8 ball.
As soon as they made it known ps+ would be required for online play I knew they were going to stop caring about the "free" games we get. I was a long time subscriber on the ps3 and loved it, received more good games than I could play.
Haven't seen a single game on ps4 I'm interested in when there are a bevy of good games at their disposal. They just don't care anymore because it's required. Good job imitating ms sony!
I have a bridge to nowhere for sell if you're one of those plebs that rely on reviews to tell you if a game is good or not. Especially ign's reviews.
I just want them to continue to develop adultlike games for mature audiences that have an engrossing storyline. Zero interest if it's some silly game with a childish theme.
Are these Destiny fanboys still trying to justify their purchase? Who are you guys trying to convince Destiny is a good game, us or yourselves? Don't know who started all this stupid division vs destiny bs, but it's annoying.
Let destiny fans enjoy their recycled halo and let division fans enjoy their generic overused setting.
Could have sworn I've heard this before, "this game" will be the one. Might be time to stop making predictions and proclamations.