uncharacted 2, tekken6bloodline rebellion, and ModernWarfare2.
but i don't have to adjust anything. my blacks look great...
was awesome, and i loved the color pallet. i get tired of greys and blues.
why so much hate? the ending was weak, but the gameplay and stages were awesome, my only knock is that in mulitplayer, it took too many bullets to kill an opponent. insomniac, don't listen to some of those noobs, keep on progressing. killzone2 multi would have been awesome if they added the cover system in the multiplayer. without the coversystem, some of the strategy is lost. only a scrub takes away a feature like that because they don't know how to use it.
quit all the hate for the ps3 cuz your broke azz cant afford one even at the slim's price.
what, i bought my 360 at launch xbl-heavens boxer, and i still enjoy it. you seem to be some ignorant fool who calls the ps3, pos, because you enjoy paying 50 buck a year for something i get for free.
i am going to pull your card.....you were raised by a pack of wild dummies, and you might not even be a girl.
point blank
i have not had to adjust any brightness level or contrast. they are the only site that has the 360 very ahead of the ps3 version. i play on a 50"sony screen so i can can easily count pixels. lens of truth of full of nonsense.
xbl-heavens boxer
psn-southpaw79
i hate to type it but you seem to be one of those idiots who paid over 200 dollars to play a game on xbl and are angry that sony ps3 owners only pay for the game and play online for free.
i truly enjoyed my xbox1, great console... the 360 is only "ok". why do so many 360 only owners desire natal. micro charges you 50 bucks a year so if you owned your 360 since lauch, you have paid at least 200 dollar for online play. i am not really into any motion control crap, be it from sony or micro. i can't see any justification for the purchase of natal until micro hacks of the online multiplayer fee and redesigns the 360 to become more reliable. i have only had 1 case of RROD ...
what is up with that lens of truth mw2 comparision.
the increased auto aim in multiplayer is "a little much sometimes", but overall very fun. the true score is an 8.5.
walking around with that silly belt....
you would know you don't have to fix anything, or you have a bootleg television.
proud owner of the ps3(southpaw79) and 360(heavensboxer), i can say my ps3 games don't look all washed out like that...take it as you will. i cant help if i work and can get what i want.
the multiplayer maps have 2 many choke points, and that D@MN rocket class.(get rid of it) the a problem with the rocket class is when you engage your opponent up close, you pepper him with head shot lead, he gives you a rocket. you both die....stupid.
that is a bad pic for your argument
the versions look near identical. i don't see one having a true edge over the other...i guess we all can enjoy.
i doubt the differences between each version of mw2 are that great. i believe they are biased. the game batman/arkham a. looked very washed out for the ps3 and i watched the game being played and it was not washed out at all. in fact 2 out of 3 staff writers preferred the ps3 version. hmmm i wonder.
if you don't own a ps3, uc2 would be lame. you cannot play it...
at this stage of this generation, i really don't worry about what valve does. there are too many other developers outshining valve in every aspect of their dev work and design team.
and buy a ps3, unless xbl got ya broke. i bought UC2, and i still got my 360, so what is your point?