never.doubt.polyphony.
ryse looked better than any game out there.(even on pc)
QTE can be good when used right like in god of war 2.
there are homebrew ps1 emulators available for ps3 too.
but while using them you dont get any guarantee whether a particular rom will work or not unlike when you purchase from psn.
internet is rather divided:
=>its cool to say that you care about gameplay and dont give a shit about graphics.
=>its also cool to hate cod,no matter what its devs do,
they put new gameplay elements over graphics.but what the hell right?internet will hate cod anyway and it would still sell 30 million copies.
@GDDR6_2014
i dont think that a less than 3 tflops gpu on pc would even come near the performance of ps4.
that aforementioned 7950 is around 2.8 tflops.
agree upon your comment on GDDR6_2014
btw this n4g comment system sucks,
you cant reply to a reply.
what he doesnt realise is that with all that optimisation ps4 will pretty much kill HD 7850.
show me a game which looks as good as the last of us which runs on a 1000$ pc made in 2006/7
exactly
why would anyone want to upgrade their gfx card which cost 500$ instead of buying a next gen console?
come on,how could any one find downloading a 20-30 year rom
not socially acceptable.
yes its technically piracy but if it has no negative impact on the video game industry,it shouldnt be considered evil.
you are right but you shoudnt expect any intelligence from Teh InTERnEt.(a piece of advice.)
"The PC version of a game will generally look better than the same game on a console. It's a fact. Take a console version and PC versions of the same game and in some cases the graphical differences will be as stark as night and day"
yeah generally pc games have more detail than console versions.but can you give me a game in which the diff is actually stark as night and day?
about the console vs pc graphics.
i think this pattern usually ...
not replying about this comment
but could you be a little more specific on the specs of your 700-800$ pc which will produce similar graphics to ps4
(actual performance,not theoretical.)
yeah right,have fun building a 1000$ pc if you want to have equivalent gaming experience(in terms of graphics) of ps4 .
someone is clearly an attention whore.
now,people are simply being assholes.
thats actually correct.but well,whatever people will hate on this guy for telling the truth.
a 2.4 tflops gtx 670 gets classified as high end,while the the 7850 (1.7 tflops) as mid range.
as ps4 gpu is 1.84 tflops. i could care less about a diff of 573.44 gflops and how reviewing sites get the authority to set bar for what is mid range and what is high end.its almost as if high or mid range gets decided on the basis of price.
ps4 is gonna perform better than the "high end" gtx 670 at the end of the day.
no one cares about theoretic...
common KH3 doesnt look so graphically advanced that it cant be on wii u.
the only reason they are not releasing a wii u version is because of wii u's sales.they just wont admit it.
its a vicious cycle-if the wii u wont have a large install base,devs wont make a wiiu game.if their are no wii u games people wont purchase the wii u.
ps4's api is based on Opengl.
belive me opengl and directx are very,very different.
the library just cant be similar to the direct x's libraries.
i doubt nomura is the programmer of this game.or a programmer at all.he might be a designer or something.
why pc gamers cant accept the fact that the best looking game at e3 was not on pc?
ryse totally looked better than any game out there.
-coming from a ps fan.