naval warfare was in 1942. but you're probably not old enough to know about that. that isnt new.
water physics? really? whats that do? you can pretend you're playing waverace 64 in the middle of a war?
map changing destruction....BF3.
graphics? no. looked identical to BF3.
Physics? how are they "better"? IT PLAYS THE SAME. I have actually played it. Where as you have NOT played ghosts. (or a COD game in quite a while possibly)
...
what did you play it on?
"adds little of real substance" really? REALLY? the squad mode alone is kind of a complete change from anything. This COD actually adds more than any COD since the first modern warfare. what did BF4 do? .... water? i played BF4 for about 15 minutes and stopped because i could hardly tell the difference from 3. which was a huge borefest. this coming from a pretty hardcore BF fan. I have every game since 1942. and ive loved all of them until 3.
the crew isnt a launch game. ... is it?
Call of Duty will sell more than BF4 dude, otherwise I agree.
newmonday, im not getting a One for at least a while, But your comment makes you look kind of silly dude. PS4's lineup is a joke without driveclub. Killzone is the only game that separates it from the competition. And while graphically its easily the best launch game of this next gen, if the gameplay is similar to previous killzones, BF4 and Ghosts are better playing games and available on both systems. mediocre indie games DO NOT make a strong launch.
That said, i cant ...
MUCH rather have 1080 @ 30 than 720 @ 60. Sorry. thats why im mainly a PC game this past gen.
fight night round 4 looks insanely realistic because of the movement motion blur. I have to side with EA on this one. That said, theres no way im buying a crappy UFC game.
superman, while i would agree for shooters, fightnight looks SO MUCH BETTER with motion blur. i think they know what theyre doing.
hmm meh. I just want GT6 on PS4. :-(
who cares. wheres fightnight?
no it didnt. it had a middle of the road GPU at best. calm down.
"Same was said about the X360, look how that turned out" HAHAHA you mean the giant failure rate? Thats not something to be proud about.
"just enhanced versions of current gen" <-- dude, what else is next gen?
1. If they changed the engine, everyone would complain because it doesnt "feel right".
2. Please dont say this is just like the 360 or ps3 versions. Having played COD on PC, PS3, and 360, I can tell you that the 2 current gen console versions are crazy muddy looking. So blurry, so low res. This video pretty much looks identical to blops 2 on a PC. Which is not a bad thing. Especially at 60fps in 1080p.
3. If you dont like it, dont buy it. Its not...
Lair was alright. Not that bad. And stop hating on Haze. it wasnt any worse than any of the other boring shooters.
RDR was 10000000 times better than this microtransaction GTAville.
this is nowhere near the greatest game of this generation. It doesnt do anything well outside of scale.
This is why I am selling my copy. "Heists are going to be a major part of the online experience." well then, how about release it with the game? its so boring right now. The prices for things are ridiculous. Offroad vehicles are pointless. And I KNOW heists are going to be really stupid anyways. Its going to force you to pick a specific way to accomplish the heist instead of letting you and your friends just figure it out. So lame.
Ahhhh OK. I play mostly on the PC for FPS. I have MW3 and BLOPS for PS3, and its really hard to look at after playing a PC version of COD. lol im glad PS4 is coming to save people from 500p or whatever theyve been forced to play at. :-D