The outdoor graphics looks great, but would have to say the indoors is not very detailed. The AI is very good too.
Nah... we really don't care about vgcharts and stuff... just wanted to hear nasim:) He's just annoying... lol
Comments? Sony needs you!
That's why games are coming out first on the 360. PS3 fans need to start buying or it will be more of the same.... waiting...
The 360 fans aren't the ones that's making a big deal about it... there's no HAHA stuff, but its the Sony fans that's doing the MS paid them conspiracy theory crap.
but your are definately not "down the middle" as soon as you said "I hope killzone 2 kills halo3, but that's kinda impossible.................. considering all the biased websites and press out their. "
That's the #1 excuse for a Sony fan when a game sucks on the PS3. It couldn't be possible that the game actually sucks.
And there's the problem with the PS3. You have to keep waiting and waiting. You talk about looking ahead and stuff, but what if I want to play now. What's funny is that PS3 fans talk about how powerful the PS3 is and so on, but now are just happy if their version of the game is close to the 360 version. That's power for you.
I don't get your logic. How will the PS3 catch up to 360 if total sales are greater for the 360? You're just looking at Japan. So if you look at total sales, the gap between the 360 and PS3 will get wider and wider.
On a side note and not trying to start another flame war, but I think the reason Xbox fans are always complaining about PS3 games being short is because that's what Sony fans did when Gears came out. They said the since 360 is last gen and used DVD, that's why the games are so short. And they said Blu-ray this and Blu-ray that.
PS3 fans should not comment on any reviews, whether good or bad. Last I checked you guys rag on reviewers. So let me guess.. this guy is good reviewer?
I had an Amiga and an Atari ST/TT... talk about fanboy wars... use to love the demos that would show off the capabilities of those machines.
Sony fans a VERY paranoid... 1. MS paid the site/publication, 2. Site is biased against Sony, 3. Site has higher standards for PS3, 4. 80% is AAA (which by that logic, 360 has tons of AAA), 5. And I love the one where Sony sent out the how to review Lair and you guys attack the reviewer's looks..... you guys can never admit that something on your beloved PS3 just sucks.
Here's the difference between PS3 and Xbox fans. PS3 blames the site as being biased instead of possibly admitting that the game could possible suck. 360 fans pretty much says oh well the game sucks.
ran at 30fps, while the 360 ran at 60fps. 2k compared their basketball game to Madden... lol
I think its because Sony's OS takes up something like 72megs (use to be 90+ I believe) while the 360's only uses 32megs.
The nice thing about EGM is that they have 3 reviewers review a game and give it a score then average it. That to me is a lot better than having just 1 reviewer.
And there's the difference between Sony and MS fans. When a site/publication gives a PS3 game a bad score, its "MS paid them off". MS fans pretty much says oh well... Sony fans always have an excuse.
Amazing that PS3 owners are ignoring all the statements being made that 2ks football game was running at 30fps on the PS3.
That's the thing.. When Gears was the big game for the 360, PS3 fans cried that it was only 10-12hrs of gameplay and blamed it on lastgen DVD storage. So of course you don't hear PS3 complaining about these two games being on BR and being too short.
Halo's graphics look great in the outdoor scenes and just ok in the indoor scenes, but then again they kept with the art style of the first two. If they would have changed it, it wouldn't be Halo. It would be like if they designed Gears II all brightly colored... it wouldn't be Gears.
BTW... the AI is really good in this game.