I don't know how they would get the controls for Diablo right if it went to consoles though. It's one of those games where keyboard and mouse if pretty much necessary.
I don't think a patch could fix that. The framerate issues have to do with the older hardware. It's like trying to run Crysis maxed on a 5 year old PC. It's enevitibly going to run into framerate issues. Same with Dragon Age, it's probably really pushing the 360's hardware. Makes me wonder if Mass Effect 2 is going to have those too, since all the videos they've shown are from the 360 version and it looks pretty smooth.
Is it just me or does Killing Floor get an update every 2 or 3 days?
Which texture mod do you use? Alot of the ones I've seen at CryMod and In-Crysis tend to look meh.
9GB!!! O_o I wonder if any games will even use that much... even my 6GB is more than enough for most things.
@Budg3tG4m3r
You do realize this is for PC only?
Grr Panda, I was about to say that and I scrolled down only to see I've been beaten to it.
@josuttis
"Killzone 2. The game that people claimed had graphics that were so far beyond anything we would ever see this gen that they were obvious 'Sony lies'. And then:
http://generationdreamteam....
If you're gonna post a comparison, at least use the 2009 version. The 2007 version looked like crap imo.
Anyways (on-topic) I'd take IGNs reviews with a grain of salt. ...
"EARLY ON – WHEN WE DECIDED TO MAKE A SEQUEL – Activision estimated out a ridiculous budget."
"Community Manager Robert Bowling said that publisher Activision was only shown the game ONCE DEVELOPMENT WAS WELL UNDER WAY."
They bascially contradicted themselves.
Lol. The community at GameFaqs usually make better guides than the official guide anyways. And who buys guides for a linear FPS game???
IW basically screwed us PC gamers over with no dedicated servers or mod support, and making it $10 more than every other PC game.
This is why I hated playing Search and Destroy or Hardcore. I would always be the ONLY person on the team to get randomly hit by a grenade. The match would start, I'd run out and take cover, bam I'm dead. Next round, I stay near the spawn point to wait for the first wave of grenades to end, but WTF BAM I'm dead. I go in a side street where no one usually goes BAM I'm dead.
I remember when eveyone thought the original looked amazing because all the console gamers were basically just coming out of PS2 era. Now it looks like crap. But I still don't get how it got Best Graphics for PC award at E3 2007 from several sites when Crysis was there too -_- Anyways, MW2 is an improvement over the first one in graphics. The lighting is better, no more of that stupid shiny outline on their clothes whenever there was light around.
A bit demanding considering the graphics don't look that good. I might get it since it's by Bioware though, they make good games.
You guys do realise that nearly every game out on the consoles runs at 30fps anyways, right?
"Gears beats UC in units sold"
Are you Epic? Do sales affect your gameplay? No.
"Gears beats UC in Multplayer(uc didnt even have it to compete- sad)"
So every game needs to have multiplayer to be good?
"Gears 2 beats UC2 in multiplayer(numbers playing at any given time)"
Both have a 10 player limit (5v5).
"gears 2 beats Uc2 in amounts of enemies on screen."
...
I don't even get the hype for the graphics. Honestly, I think Heavenly Sword looked better. The only problem was the constant 25fps.
Well FINALLY. Now off to try it :)
"Have fun playing this game... and by playing, I mean watching. And by watching, I mean watching pictures or videos from tech demoers, not rendered by your own PC.
Meanwhile, PS3 owners are playing Uncharted 2 right now, guaranteed fun and great graphics in one package."
You can go on Counter-Strike or Team Fortress 2 and ask random people if they've seen Uncharted 2, and I garentee you alot of them will be like "what? what's that?" Most PC g...
"people have been left amazed by new weapons and mostly the graphics."
Um, they still look like Halo 3 to me.