After 5 minutes I'll be like
http://img.photobucket.com/...
I have yet to play Wolfenstein (don't hate me, too many gaemz!), but from what I hear the game was definitely worth full retail price when it released let alone $25.
Really nice deal, appreciate the link
Quite an interesting idea. More media that is accessible and more ways to play said media is always gonna be a plus in my book. Great apps on the X1
Agreed and well said but it's still pretty funny to see everyone attempt this. They were stuck at a bridge for soooo long lol
It'd be impossible. They've now been shooting a rock for 5 minutes...
I'm already paying $150 a month for unlimited (actually 500gb but they call it unlimited just ~cos~) and I live just outside of Sydney. IF these plans come to fruition I can almost guarantee that we will express public outrage as we're already paying ridiculous amounts for internets, games and pretty much every form of digital entertainment.
Wasn't there a report last year that revealed us Aussies pirated Game of Thrones the most in the world? Well guess what, we ...
Looks great. Can't wait for MKX!!!
All these DV's and not one person to support them and counter the facts that I listed. Really guys? lol
+1 Well said to the both of you.
All platforms have a nice lineup due to hit the gaming front by the end of 2015. It's simply too early to tell "who has the best exclusives". Even when their out, it's always going to be subjective and hard to compare imo.
Looking like a good year ahead for gamers
@Godmars "Wait until Activision, Square, 2K, and Bethesda start asking for access to each of their libraries for $30 a year."
Theoretically speaking, even if these companies do what EA is doing, are more options and cheaper access to games BAD for gamers? No, it is not bad for us. LESS options are bad for the gamers. A company deciding what is and isn't of "good value" is bad for us gamers.
More options are always better. Don't lik...
Avernus you are VERY misinformed.
There was NO deal from MS for EA Access. Sony fumbled and rejected the service making it an X1 exclusive (adding to it's value on MS's console mind you). So in essence, your comparison to Sony making that Destiny deal with Activision which keeps dlc content from X1 for a year is WAY off.
All of these misinformed fans and fanboys are very 'sad' indeed.
Or even easier, X1 as myself and most others already call it. Simple and easy to type and remember tbh.
God, aren't you good a trolling... Derp derp
Nothing to see here folks, just another Nirvana.
These Nirvana dudes who pop up on gaming sites are always laughable.
Carry on.
It's called lack of optimization. And would you care to explain why neither versions are running the 8 year old game at 60fps?
Lazy.Optimization. Stop being a fanboy.
So they should be acquiring more engineers to support their well selling console, no?
Agreed with avoiding buggy features, but was there not a big stuff up not long ago with many people consoles failing to boot up after a major update? I'm not dissing, genuinely curious as I heard a lot of people speaking up about it at the time.
I think PS4 owners deserve more engineers working harder to push out updates seeing how phenomenally well it has sold. Just an ...
Agreed. Though if you played the Halo 5 Guardians beta you would see how much 343i have listened and are continuing to listen with an actual beta being used to develop the MP side of the game further.
As in Halo 4's campaign, because it was brilliantly done. Multiplayer is a different story that clearly wasn't well received, though I honestly never played it.
Derp
As much as I don't like Greenberg, he is right about Halo 5. That beta was amazing and left us all slobbering and wanting more.
If the campaign is half as good as Halo 4 then I'm more than thrilled to play it.
Great year for games
Indeed, as much bad attention that its received, the kinect 2 is gonna be pretty entertaining for families with games like these. I love it