@AliTheSnake1
Yes there's a lot of nudity and yes that's to sell the show, but unfortunately that's the trend now days. It rarely has any importance as much as people say it adds to the show.
But that doesn't mean the show isn't amazing, it's literally one of the greatest shows ever created. You can't judge is by watching a few episodes, since it's based off a book, the story is carefully unraveled, things don't just happen...
I loved this game! It was just brilliant with it's options, being able to do missions with so many options was handled extremely well in this game.
I hope the next one has better graphics, that was literally the only little shortfall. I really grew into the art style though.
definitely, well big changes won't happen anyway because they've already built the foundation and I'm sure they already took all the feedback before doing that.
Otherwise, they can make a lot of changes in a year too. Most games take about 2 years to make, so this game is basically only half done, enough time.
^^^
http://www.metacritic.com/g...
Read the reviews, Driveclub isn't reviewed poorly because of matchmaking issues. It's the whole online component that's bad. And in general most of the reviews say the game just wasn't good due to lack of content and a not so great single player experience.
This is not a jab at PS4 btw, I...
Because that's a temporary issue, the review score stays forever. I play a bunch of matches today lag free and I couldn't put it down. If matchmaking works perfectly next week are they gonna increase the score?
Besides single player alone in this collection is a 10.
I agree 100%, voting with wallet concept simply does not work, unless thousands of people do it at once. Game is a recreational activity for me, and I'm not about skip on one of my most anticipated games in hopes of sparking a revolution.
Why don't people just wait a couple of weeks and see if there are issues with the game. Far cry 4 looks amazing and I don't see anything wrong with it. And I'm sure it's made by a different team than Assassin's creed ...
I don't like this new trend of full priced half games. I had a lot of fun with the alpha but it really makes me wish for a campaign, all the things they can do with that.
If the multiplayer component is big enough to compensate for a lack of single player then it's fine, which doesn't seem to be the case, otherwise I don't think it's worth $60.
Good thing is these types of games drop is price hella fast, titanfall is already $25 in 7 mon...
That's a shoe horned comment
What, why would they give it to a remastered game, that's just stupid, specially since it just came out last year.
I was gonna say the same thing. Its a friggin outrage, wtf were they thinking, so if the world's greatest game was released in December they'll just ignore it, how does that make sense?
Also vaas should've won character of the year, stupid ass VGAs.
It really isn't bad. The game was amazing up until like level 23, if it was just an RPG with a few more missions and they left it at that it would be great. The only issue is after that it turns into an mmo and you have to repeat the same missions over and over and over again to level up so you can play vault of glass , and it turns into a chore. That deteriorates from the game because of the lack of content.
Loll when dumbasses complain for getting free games. This is a win for gamers, its cheap and its offering the best value for games this year.
If anything most of you commentators seem desperate...to play games on your ps4s or why else would you troll.
Yea i think they're really doing a good job adhering to everyone. It has the hardcore competitive spirit with the balance and equal start gameplay. And it has enough new features and implementations to appeal to a newer crowd without making any sacrifices.
Only things id like changed are some of the gun designs. The AR needs to be modified a bit, it looks classic and should look that way but it needs a little more badassery, same with the sniper, also the thing at the en...
That's been there since 2012, it was just a loadout armour ability and now it's standard.........
I can't believe how much fun it is still playing a 13 year old (literally as of tomorrow) game online. I can't think many any other shooters that are this easy to pick up and play in multiplayer, after 13 years!
I agree, scarab battles in halo 3 put it right at the top.
lol, that should be an exotic upgrade
That makes no sense, the review scores stay permanent forever, while any server issues are very short and temporary. There's no way the game will still be having the same problems a month or two from now.
While I agree a game should be working perfectly at launch, there should be a probationary period, and reviews should factor that in. You can't rate a game on impulse if it's actually an amazing game.
If next week the game is running perfectly ...
This has to be a joke, it's cool for the reviewer to give his opinion, but if he expects a remake to be a completely different game than the original I can only laugh...
I still think nothing compares to the Master chief Collection, but this is a pretty awesome remake too.