Wouldn't it be better idea to just gift a copy and you still support the devs? What's the point of keeping an extra one, unless you're planning to have it for 2 separate platforms.
lol what?
lol
I played the beta and really enjoyed it. Makes it all the worse that it's so short on content.
Kinda similar to setting up a private match. There's no custom games browser within the game but there are plenty to sites dedicated to setting up custom matches,
like https://www.reddit.com/r/Ha...
I think he's being sarcastic...
It's still April 5
Yea there's no way. Maybe Q2 if they somehow show it in January.
where the hell is this game??!
^You're also missing the point. The value has always been subjective to gamers, no one can tell you what you should or should've pay for games. But we have the right to object to and criticize when we feel something isn't providing enough value for what it's price it's set as.
I find it surprising you say you're saying it doesn't matter, yet you're clearly having an argument with me on an article stating that it DOES matter. It matters enough t...
NO you're confusing YOUR perception of value with what's expected of a game at that price. No one is saying load of content has to hinder the high standard, part of the value is having load of content AND high quality. If you get a 1000 hours from a game you're getting value sure, but that's not what the argument is about, you can't measure that in your hours logged.
I could get 1000 hours, quality hours, out of Commandos on my computer, if they remade it...
lol maybe because it wasn't a flop?
It's one of the best action games this year, and critically stood up to Fallout 4 after being released the same day.
http://www.metacritic.com/g...
^This is the opposite of flop. I really have no idea what you're talking about, nowhere in the article does it mention sales.
This game just looks so cool, I wanna grab it!!
That's no way to justify the price, people need to stop putting their personal preferences into industry standards for gamers.
You got a lot of value out of it and that's great but do you honestly think for $60 you shouldn't have gotten MORE content compared to the value other games provide their audiences? Would you not be happier if you got more game modes, more maps, and a bigger game that is already your favourite game this year?
There is a di...
it's half life 3.
wtf lol how does not wanting to pay $60 for multiplayer-only mean you don't like multiplayer??
I love multiplayer, but for $60 I want at least 25 maps, sounds ridiculous but it's not, because many games have had more than 25 maps. I want large scale combat, make it a 64 player game with a ton of vehicles, customization, and enough game modes to it interesting WITHOUT charging $50 for freakin DLC.
It's not about how many hours you log in. Of course...
Yes it should go both ways.
Multiplayer-only shouldn't be $60 unless it actually has enough content to justify it. So far I have yet to see a game this gen which does that. Evolve, Battlefront, and Rainbow six are all guilty of this bullshit.
Same goes for 6 hour single player only games. For it to be $60 there should be at least 13-20 hours of QUALITY gameplay.
It's true, some are technically considered console exclusives. But how about stop getting offended over technicalities when you quite obviously know the purpose of the article is to showcase Xbox exclusives and Xbox console exclusives.
If you really wanna get technical then no game is exclusive because all games are made on PC's.
Calling it Xbox console exclusives or Microsoft exclusives or anything else isn't going to change the fact that these g...
It's not a 1st $50 season pass, and Call of Duty/Battlefield both got flak for it, but it all got repressed because people got tired of complaining year after year (specially for COD). Also those games at least had enough content otherwise.
It has never been "OK", but regardless, the fact is that COD having it doesn't justify Battlefront having it, because they're both wrong.
Wow interesting, didn't even know about this.