Well, I manage to run PS2 at 1080p/60fps on max settings with a single GTX 770 and a Core i7-2600k. But I have friends who have managed to run it around the same settings and performance with i5-4670k CPUs and single GTX 660ti GPUs...Hope that helps.
You can always try and use share factory...
I play MK9 on PC, even now. I can confirm that on pc max settings, MK9 does NOT look better or even on par with the MKX gameplay we've seen.
What do you mean NetherRealms is incapable of making their female characters hot? Mileena! XD
Delsin Rowe as exclusive PS4 character anyone?
Erm, that wasn't CGI...
Whoa! A GTX 570/HD 7870 as a minimum requirement? That's a bit steep. Isn't the XBO's GPU much, much weaker than that? Heck, the minimum GPU requirement is even higher than Watch_Dogs...
O_O
The visuals look good, but some of the punching animations seemed robotic....
That title is very confusing :/
I'm assuming they're enjoying the best version (for now until the PC problems get fixed) of Watch_Dogs right now, hence why they seem quite. But I don't see how this thread has anything to do with Sony or Xbox fans. This is a PC related article/thread.
Hopefully this patch does what it's supposed to. Maybe then I'll reinstall the game.
I agree to some extent with your comment. But I just had to say this; it's "were", not "where".
I get frame drops to zero fps on my PC sporting a gtx 770. So what's your point?
Well, although the PC version may look slightly better, the ps4 does have convenience. I got WD for PC this morning; it's midnight now and I'm still tweaking the graphics settings and xml files to fix all the performance/graphical issues with the game. My friends who got it for ps4 have been playing all day, whereas it took me an hour to get uplay running, after that searching the internet for stuttering fix. It's very rare that a AAA game launch on PC has gone without problems; a...
The only difference in the 4GB and 2GB 770 would be the texture settings. Everything else will be identical.
Edge giving this game an 8/10? Game must be good.
I've played it for a couple of hours now and I have to say that's it's been an overall positive experience, gameplay wise. Hacking is definitely fun and I find the random crimes more fun that the main missions lol! Though since I'm playing on PC, there are massive stuttering issues sometimes rendering the game unplayable. There are fixes out there, and I'll be trying them out later tonight, but it shouldn't be this way. Anyways, I personally would say this game is a 8 ...
Those GTX 770 benchmark numbers make me happy. Not because they're better than 290x numbers (shame on you Ubisoft!), but because it means I'll be able to run the game decently (gtx 770). Hopefully Ubisoft fixes this AMD issue, as I've got a few friends who use AMD cards, and I wanna play WD with them online without they're game getting screwed up all the time.
The question is, was gameplay ever a problem for CoD? Most complained about engine/graphics or how every modern warfare game was basically the same as the first, but the gameplay i.e. shooting mechanics, etc, has always been tight for CoD imo. This time, with mechsuits, they're trying something different, so it DOES make it somewhat innovative for the franchise. If the "same gameplay" was a problem, then people would stop playing the battlefield series long time ago, but no one ...